Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Mar 17, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 20, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Regulating AI in Mental Health – The Ethics of Care Perspective
ABSTRACT
Background:
This article contends that the responsible AI approach—which is the dominant ethics approach ruling most regulatory and ethical guidance—falls short because it overlooks the impact of AI on human relationships. Focusing only on responsible AI principles reinforces a narrow concept of accountability and responsibility of companies developing AI. This article proposes that integrating the ethics of care approach can offer a more comprehensive regulatory and ethical framework that addresses AI’s impact on human relationships. This dual approach is essential for the effective regulation of AI in the domain of mental health care. The article delves into the emergence of the new “therapeutic” area facilitated by AI-based bots, which operate without a therapist. The article highlights the difficulties involved, mainly the absence of a defined duty of care towards users, and shows how implementing ethics of care can establish clear responsibilities for developers. It also sheds light on the potential for emotional manipulation and the risks involved. In conclusion, the article proposes a series of considerations grounded in the ethics of care for the developmental process of AI-powered therapeutic tools.
Objective:
To suggest a new framework for regulating AI in mental health care based on the ethics of care
Methods:
theoretical analysis
Results:
Ethics of care principles formulated for regulating AI in mental healthcare and a suggested mechanism for ethical evaluation for implementing AI-bots (without a therapist) in mental healthcare
Conclusions:
Responsible AI is not sufficient for regulating AI in mental healthcare as it overlooks emotions and relationships, and a dual approach (both responsible AI approach and ethics of care approach) is needed to regulate AI in mental healthcare in an effective way
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.