Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Mar 13, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 1, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Self-Management Programs Among Athletes With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Masoudi A, Chemane N, Useh U, Bello B, Magida N

Effectiveness of Self-Management Programs Among Athletes With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: Protocol for a Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e58340

DOI: 10.2196/58340

PMID: 39485375

PMCID: 11568400

Effectiveness of Self-management program among athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome: A systematic review Protocol

  • Ameen Masoudi; 
  • Nomzamo Chemane; 
  • Ushotanefe Useh; 
  • Bashir Bello; 
  • Nontembiso Magida

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patellofemoral pain syndrome is a highly prevalent overuse knee injury in athletic populations associated with pain and functional limitations, exacerbated by activities such as running, pivoting, cycling, and jumping. Self-management programs empowering athletes to take an active role in controlling their symptoms for chronic musculoskeletal conditions like patellofemoral pain syndrome have grown in popularity. However, the efficacy of self-management programs specifically for athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome is unclear due to limited and heterogeneous evidence.

Objective:

The systematic review study will evaluate the effectiveness of self-management programs on pain and function, in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Methods:

PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases will be systematically searched using terms related to "patellofemoral pain syndrome", "self-management", and "athletes". Interventional studies that are randomized and non-randomized controlled trials will be included, comparing self-management programs to other treatments or control conditions among athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Four reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data using the COVIDENCE software, and assess the quality of the study and evidence using the Pedro scale of risk of bias tool and GRADE approach, respectively. If feasible, a meta-analysis will be performed using the RevMan 5.4 software.

Results:

This study is self-funded by the researchers. We aim to start reviewing articles March 2024 and completing data extraction in June 2024. The results will be synthesized through a narrative approach employing qualitative thematic analysis of the studies.

Conclusions:

This systematic review protocol outlines a rigorous methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of self-management programs among patellofemoral pain syndrome athletes. The findings will inform clinical practice and guide the development of tailored interventions to optimize outcomes for athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO CRD42023492746


 Citation

Please cite as:

Masoudi A, Chemane N, Useh U, Bello B, Magida N

Effectiveness of Self-Management Programs Among Athletes With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: Protocol for a Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e58340

DOI: 10.2196/58340

PMID: 39485375

PMCID: 11568400

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.