Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Mar 12, 2024
Date Accepted: Apr 7, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of Popular US Smartphone Health Care Apps: Comparative Analysis Study Toward Sustainable Health and Nutrition Apps Practices

Almasri A, El-Kour TY, Silva L, Abdulfattah Y

Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of Popular US Smartphone Health Care Apps: Comparative Analysis Study Toward Sustainable Health and Nutrition Apps Practices

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e58311

DOI: 10.2196/58311

PMID: 38729624

PMCID: 11127174

Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of Popular US Smartphone Healthcare Applications: A Comparative Analysis Study Towards Sustainable health and nutrition applications Practices

  • Abdullah Almasri; 
  • Tatyana Y. El-Kour; 
  • Liliana Silva; 
  • Yousef Abdulfattah

ABSTRACT

Background:

The emergence of smartphones has sparked a transformation across multiple fields, healthcare being one of the most notable, with the advent of mobile health applications. Among these, mobile health applications have gained popularity, highlighting the need to understand their energy consumption patterns as an integral part of the evolving landscape of healthcare technologies.

Objective:

To identify the key contributors to elevated energy consumption in mobile health applications and suggest methods for their optimization, addressing a significant void in our comprehension of the energy dynamics at play within mobile health applications.

Methods:

Through quantitative comparative analysis of ten prominent mobile health applications available on Android platforms within the United States, this study examines factors contributing to high energy consumption. The analysis included descriptive statistics, comparative analysis using analysis of variance, and regression analysis to examine how certain factors impact energy use and consumption.

Results:

Observed energy use variances in mobile health applications stem from user interactions, features, and underlying technology. Descriptive analysis revealed variability in app energy consumption (150-310 mWh), highlighting the influence of user interaction and application complexity. analysis of variance verified these findings, indicating the critical role of engagement and functionality. Regression modeling (Energy Consumption = β₀ + β₁Notification Frequency + β₂GPS Usage + β₃*Application Complexity + ε), with statistically significant P-values (Notification Frequency P=.01, GPS Usage P=.05, Application Complexity P=.03), further quantified these bases' effects on energy usage.

Conclusions:

The observed differences in energy consumption of dietary applications reaffirm the need for a multidisciplinary approach to bring together application developers, end-users, and healthcare experts to foster improved energy conservation practice while achieving a balance between sustainable practice and user-experience. More research is needed to better understand how to scale up consumer engagement to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal 12 on responsible consumption and production.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Almasri A, El-Kour TY, Silva L, Abdulfattah Y

Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of Popular US Smartphone Health Care Apps: Comparative Analysis Study Toward Sustainable Health and Nutrition Apps Practices

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e58311

DOI: 10.2196/58311

PMID: 38729624

PMCID: 11127174

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.