Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Feb 28, 2024
Date Accepted: May 2, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Wunderlich MM, Krampe H, Fuest K, Leicht D, Probst MB, Runge J, Schmid S, Spies C, Weiß B, Balzer F, Poncette AS, Study Group

Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e57658

DOI: 10.2196/57658

PMID: 39119994

PMCID: 11539858

Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis

  • Maximilian Markus Wunderlich; 
  • Henning Krampe; 
  • Kristina Fuest; 
  • Dominik Leicht; 
  • Moriz Benedikt Probst; 
  • Julian Runge; 
  • Sebastian Schmid; 
  • Claudia Spies; 
  • Björn Weiß; 
  • Felix Balzer; 
  • Akira-Sebastian Poncette; 
  • Study Group

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire (CAFQa) is a 9-item Questionnaire that aims to standardize how alarm fatigue (AF) in nurses and physicians is measured. We previously hypothesized that it has two correlated scales, i.e. one on the psychosomatic effects of AF and the other on staff’s coping strategies in working with alarms.

Objective:

We aimed to validate the hypothesized structure of the CAFQa and thus underpin the instrument's construct validity.

Methods:

We conducted two independent studies with nurses and physicians from ICUs in Germany (NStudy 1 = 265, NStudy 2 = 1212). Responses to the questionnaires were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis with the unweighted least-squares algorithm based on polychoric covariances. Convergent validity was assessed by participants' estimation of their own AF and exposure to false alarms in percent.

Results:

In both studies the chi-square test reached statistical significance (ꭓ2(26) = 44.932, P=.012 and ꭓ2(26) = 92.416, P<.001 for Study 1 and 2, respectively). Other fit indices suggested a good model fit (in both studies RMSEA < 0.05, SRMR < 0.08, RNI > 0.95, TLI > 0.95, and CFI > 0.995). Participants' mean scores correlated moderately with self-reported AF (rStudy 1 = 0.45; rStudy 2 = 0.53) and weakly with self-perceived exposure to false alarms (rStudy 1 = 0.3; rStudy 2 = 0.33).

Conclusions:

The questionnaire measures the construct of alarm fatigue as proposed in our previous study. Researchers and clinicians can rely on the CAFQa to measure the AF of nurses and physicians. Clinical Trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04994600


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wunderlich MM, Krampe H, Fuest K, Leicht D, Probst MB, Runge J, Schmid S, Spies C, Weiß B, Balzer F, Poncette AS, Study Group

Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e57658

DOI: 10.2196/57658

PMID: 39119994

PMCID: 11539858

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.