Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Maximilian Markus Wunderlich;
Henning Krampe;
Kristina Fuest;
Dominik Leicht;
Moriz Benedikt Probst;
Julian Runge;
Sebastian Schmid;
Claudia Spies;
Björn Weiß;
Felix Balzer;
Akira-Sebastian Poncette;
Study Group
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire (CAFQa) is a 9-item Questionnaire that aims to standardize how alarm fatigue (AF) in nurses and physicians is measured. We previously hypothesized that it has two correlated scales, i.e. one on the psychosomatic effects of AF and the other on staff’s coping strategies in working with alarms.
Objective:
We aimed to validate the hypothesized structure of the CAFQa and thus underpin the instrument's construct validity.
Methods:
We conducted two independent studies with nurses and physicians from ICUs in Germany (NStudy 1 = 265, NStudy 2 = 1212). Responses to the questionnaires were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis with the unweighted least-squares algorithm based on polychoric covariances. Convergent validity was assessed by participants' estimation of their own AF and exposure to false alarms in percent.
Results:
In both studies the chi-square test reached statistical significance (ꭓ2(26) = 44.932, P=.012 and ꭓ2(26) = 92.416, P<.001 for Study 1 and 2, respectively). Other fit indices suggested a good model fit (in both studies RMSEA < 0.05, SRMR < 0.08, RNI > 0.95, TLI > 0.95, and CFI > 0.995). Participants' mean scores correlated moderately with self-reported AF (rStudy 1 = 0.45; rStudy 2 = 0.53) and weakly with self-perceived exposure to false alarms (rStudy 1 = 0.3; rStudy 2 = 0.33).
Conclusions:
The questionnaire measures the construct of alarm fatigue as proposed in our previous study. Researchers and clinicians can rely on the CAFQa to measure the AF of nurses and physicians. Clinical Trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04994600
Citation
Please cite as:
Wunderlich MM, Krampe H, Fuest K, Leicht D, Probst MB, Runge J, Schmid S, Spies C, Weiß B, Balzer F, Poncette AS, Study Group
Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis