Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Mar 1, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 1, 2024 - Apr 26, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 4, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Accelerometry-Assessed Physical Activity and Circadian Rhythm to Detect Clinical Disability Status in Multiple Sclerosis: Cross-Sectional Study

Bou Rjeily N, Sanjayan M, Guha Niyogi P, Dewey BE, Zambriczki Lee A, Hulett C, Dagher G, Hu C, Mazur RD, Kenney EM, Brennan E, DuVal A, Calabresi PA, Zipunnikov V, Fitzgerald KC, Mowry EM

Accelerometry-Assessed Physical Activity and Circadian Rhythm to Detect Clinical Disability Status in Multiple Sclerosis: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e57599

DOI: 10.2196/57599

PMID: 40163850

PMCID: 11975255

Accelerometry-assessed Physical Activity and Circadian Rhythm to Detect Clinical Disability Status in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Study

  • Nicole Bou Rjeily; 
  • Muraleetharan Sanjayan; 
  • Pratim Guha Niyogi; 
  • Blake E Dewey; 
  • Alexandra Zambriczki Lee; 
  • Christy Hulett; 
  • Gabriella Dagher; 
  • Chen Hu; 
  • Rafal D Mazur; 
  • Elena M Kenney; 
  • Erin Brennan; 
  • Anna DuVal; 
  • Peter A Calabresi; 
  • Vadim Zipunnikov; 
  • Kathryn C Fitzgerald; 
  • Ellen M Mowry

ABSTRACT

Background:

Tools for measuring clinical disability status in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are limited. Accelerometry objectively assesses physical activity and circadian rhythmicity profiles in the real-world environment and may potentially distinguish levels of disability in MS.

Objective:

To determine if accelerometry can detect differences in physical activity and circadian rhythmicity patterns between relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS).

Methods:

This study represents an analysis of the baseline data from the prospective HEAL-MS study. Participants were divided into three groups based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) criteria for sustained disability progression: RRMS-Stable, RRMS-Suspected progression, and PMS. Baseline visits occurred between January 2021 and March 2023. Clinical outcome measures were collected by masked examiners. Participants wore the GT9X Link Actigraph on their non-dominant wrists for two weeks.

Results:

A total of 253 participants were included: 86 RRMS-Stable, 82 RRMS-Suspected progression, and 85 PMS. Compared to RRMS, PMS participants had lower total activity counts (β: -0.32 [95% CI: -0.61, -0.03]), lower time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (β: -0.01 [-0.02, -0.004]), higher active-to-sedentary transition probability (β: 5.68 [1.86, 9.50]), lower amplitude (β: -0.0004 [-0.0008, -0.0001]), lower MESOR (β: -0.0009 [-0.002, -0.0002]), higher intra-daily variability (β: 4.64 [1.45, 7.84]), and lower inter-daily stability (β: -4.43 [-8.77, -0.10]). No significant differences were detected between the two RRMS subtypes except for lower relative amplitude in those with suspected progression.

Conclusions:

Accelerometry detected differences in physical activity patterns between RRMS and PMS. Longitudinal follow-up is underway to assess the potential for accelerometry to detect disability progression.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bou Rjeily N, Sanjayan M, Guha Niyogi P, Dewey BE, Zambriczki Lee A, Hulett C, Dagher G, Hu C, Mazur RD, Kenney EM, Brennan E, DuVal A, Calabresi PA, Zipunnikov V, Fitzgerald KC, Mowry EM

Accelerometry-Assessed Physical Activity and Circadian Rhythm to Detect Clinical Disability Status in Multiple Sclerosis: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e57599

DOI: 10.2196/57599

PMID: 40163850

PMCID: 11975255

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.