Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Feb 21, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 21, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Rojas-Cárdenas A, Cleaver S, Sarmiento I, Cockcroft A, Andersson N

Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e57590

DOI: 10.2196/57590

PMID: 40063938

PMCID: 11933751

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Canadian Indigenous community views of disability: Protocol for a scoping review

  • Andrés Rojas-Cárdenas; 
  • Shaun Cleaver; 
  • Ivan Sarmiento; 
  • Anne Cockcroft; 
  • Neil Andersson

ABSTRACT

Background:

In settler colonial countries, Indigenous people do not necessarily view disability in the same way as do other dominant groups. Indigenous conceptualizations of disability are connected to their ancestral history, cultural customs, and environmental context. Some Indigenous groups do not contain a word that is the equivalent to disability in their native language. To address this gap, this scoping review will map the current literature to identify the perspectives, concepts, and understandings of disability in Indigenous communities in Canada.

Objective:

The objective of this scoping review is to map the literature on perspectives, concepts, and understandings of disability in Indigenous communities in Canada.

Methods:

Following the methodological framework for scoping reviews of Arksey and O’Malley, we will search online databases, including Ovid Medline, PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, Web of Science, CBCA and Autochtonia. We will search gray literature through the Google search engine, conference abstracts, dissertation databases, government documents and Indigenous organization websites. We will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies in English and French. The included studies will describe Indigenous approaches to disability, as they are understood based on personal, cultural, and historical contexts. Two reviewers will use Covidence software to remove duplicates, screen articles, record the step-by-step selection process, and extract data from the included articles. We will use ResearchRabbit.ai and Elicit with the list of selected articles to identify any additional similar references. All the relevant reports will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We will report the findings in tables or charts, with accompanying narrative summaries.

Results:

It is intended that this scoping review will be completed within 12 months following the publication of this protocol.

Conclusions:

We anticipate that the findings from the scoping review will provide be useful for professionals, researchers, and policymakers interested in designing and implementing evidence-informed disability programs and services for Indigenous communities in Canada, preventing mismatches between the programs and the sociocultural context. The results of this review will be disseminated through conferences, publications in scientific journals, and engagement with relevant stakeholders. Clinical Trial: The protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework database (osf.io/9rzkx).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rojas-Cárdenas A, Cleaver S, Sarmiento I, Cockcroft A, Andersson N

Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e57590

DOI: 10.2196/57590

PMID: 40063938

PMCID: 11933751

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.