Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 20, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped-Care ICBT for Childhood and Adolescent Anxiety: Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) delivered with therapist-guidance has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of child and adolescent anxiety, though widespread delivery is limited by therapist availability. Self-guided ICBT achieves greater reach, though demonstrates poorer engagement and less clinical benefits. Alternative models of care are required that promote engagement, are effective, accessible, and scalable.
Objective:
This preregistered randomised trial evaluated whether a stepped-care approach to ICBT using therapist guidance via videoconferencing for the step-up component (ICBT-SC(VC)) is non-inferior to therapist-guided ICBT (ICBT-TG(VC)) for child and adolescent anxiety.
Methods:
Participants included 137 Australian children and adolescents aged 7-17 years (61 male), with a primary anxiety disorder. This randomised, non-inferiority trial compared ICBT-SC(VC) to an ICBT-TG(VC) program with assessments conducted at baseline, 12-weeks, and 9-months after treatment commencement. All ICBT-TG(VC) participants received therapist guidance (videoconferencing) after each session, for all 10 sessions. All ICBT-SC(VC) participants completed the first 5 sessions online without therapist guidance. If they demonstrated response to treatment after the first 5 sessions (defined as reductions in anxiety symptoms into the non-clinical range), they continued the online sessions in a self-guided manner (no therapist guidance). If they did not respond, participants were stepped-up to receive supplemental therapist-guidance (videoconferencing) for the remaining sessions. Measures included clinical diagnostic interview with clinician-rated severity rating as the primary outcome, as well as parent and child reported anxiety and anxiety-related interference (secondary outcomes).
Results:
Though there were no significant differences between treatment conditions on primary and almost all secondary outcome measures, tests of non-inferiority did not confirm non-inferiority of ICBT-SC(VC) compared to ICBT-TG(VC). Significant clinical benefits were evident for participants in both treatments, though this was significantly higher for ICBT-TG(VC) participants. Of participants who remained in the study, 68% (41% ITT) of ICBT-SC(VC) and 88% (69% ITT) of ICBT-TG(VC) were free of their primary anxiety diagnosis by 9-month follow-up. Therapy compliance was lower for ICBT-SC(VC) than ICBT-TG(VC), though treatment satisfaction was moderate to high in both conditions.
Conclusions:
This study provided further support for the benefits of low-intensity stepped-care adaptive approaches to ICBT for anxious children and adolescents and highlighted the excellent treatment outcomes that can be achieved through therapist-guided ICBT delivered via videoconferencing. Both treatments may offer an acceptable treatment model that could increase access to evidence-based care. Clinical Trial: The study’s design, hypotheses and analysis plan were preregistered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001418268).
Citation
The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.