Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Feb 15, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 6, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Suspected Mpox Symptoms and Testing in Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study

Atkins K, Carpino T, Rao A, Sanchez TH, Edwards OW, Hannah M, Sullivan PS, Ogale YP, Abara WE, Delaney KP, Baral SD

Suspected Mpox Symptoms and Testing in Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e57399

DOI: 10.2196/57399

PMID: 39819589

PMCID: 11756838

Suspected mpox symptoms and testing in an online sample among men who have sex with men in the United States, August 2022: A cross-sectional study

  • Kaitlyn Atkins; 
  • Thomas Carpino; 
  • Amrita Rao; 
  • Travis H. Sanchez; 
  • O. Winslow Edwards; 
  • Marissa Hannah; 
  • Patrick S. Sullivan; 
  • Yasmin P. Ogale; 
  • Winston E. Abara; 
  • Kevin P. Delaney; 
  • Stefan D. Baral

ABSTRACT

Background:

The 2022 mpox epidemic in the United States disproportionately affected gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Uptake of mpox testing may be related to symptomology, sociodemographic characteristics, and behavioral characteristics.

Objective:

To describe suspected mpox symptoms and testing uptake among an online sample of GBMSM in the U.S. in August 2022.

Methods:

We conducted a rapid online mpox survey from August 5–15, 2022 among cisgender men 15 years and older who had previously participated in the 2021 American Men’s Internet Survey. We estimated the prevalence of suspected mpox symptoms (fever or rash/sores with unknown cause in the last 3 months) and uptake of mpox testing. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between participant characteristics and suspected mpox symptoms, and summarized characteristics of GBMSM reporting mpox testing. Among symptomatic GBMSM who did not receive mpox testing, we described testing self-efficacy, barriers, and facilitators.

Results:

Of 824 GBMSM, 126 (15.3%) reported at least one mpox symptom in the last 3 months; 58/126 (46.0%) with rash/sores, 57 (45.2%) with fever, and 11 (8.7%) with both. Increased prevalence of suspected mpox symptoms was associated with condomless anal sex (CAS; aPR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.20). Mpox testing was reported by 9/824 GBMSM (1%), including five with symptoms. Most GBMSM reporting mpox testing were non-Hispanic white (7/9 vs one Black, one Hispanic/Latino) and all nine lived in urban areas. Most reported having an STI test (8/9), two or more partners (8/9), CAS (7/9), and group sex (6/9) in the last 3 months. Of those tested, three reported living with HIV and all were on treatment whereas the remaining six men without HIV reported current pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use. Of symptomatic GBMSM who did not report mpox testing, 47/105 (44.8%) had low mpox testing self-efficacy. Among those with low self-efficacy, the most common barriers to testing were not knowing where to get tested (40/47, 85.1%) and difficulty getting appointments (23/47, 48.9%). Among those with high testing self-efficacy (58/105, 55.2%), the most common facilitators to testing were knowing where to test (52/58, 89.7%), convenient site hours (40/58, 69.0%), and low-cost testing (38/58, 65.5%).

Conclusions:

While all GBMSM who reported testing for mpox were linked to HIV treatment or PrEP, those with symptoms but no mpox testing reported fewer such links. This suggests targeted outreach is needed to reduce structural barriers to mpox services among GBMSM in rural areas, Black and Hispanic/Latino GBMSM, and GBMSM living with HIV. Sustaining and scaling community tailored messaging to promote testing and vaccination represent critical interventions for mpox control among GBMSM in the U.S.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Atkins K, Carpino T, Rao A, Sanchez TH, Edwards OW, Hannah M, Sullivan PS, Ogale YP, Abara WE, Delaney KP, Baral SD

Suspected Mpox Symptoms and Testing in Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e57399

DOI: 10.2196/57399

PMID: 39819589

PMCID: 11756838

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.