Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Feb 23, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 23, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study

Mayer A, Hege I, Kononowicz AA, Müller A, Sudacka M

Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e57331

DOI: 10.2196/57331

PMID: 39883032

PMCID: 11801104

Collaborative development of feedback concept maps for virtual patient-based clinical reasoning education: a mixed-methods study

  • Anja Mayer; 
  • Inga Hege; 
  • Andrzej A. Kononowicz; 
  • Anja Müller; 
  • Małgorzata Sudacka

ABSTRACT

Background:

Concept maps are a suitable method for teaching clinical reasoning (CR). For example, in a concept map, findings, tests, differential diagnoses, and treatment options can be documented and connected to each other. When combined with virtual patients, automated feedback can be provided to the students’ concept maps. However, as CR is a non-linear process, feedback concept maps that are created together by several individuals might address this issue and cover perspectives from different health professions.

Objective:

In this study, we aimed to develop a collaborative process for creating feedback concept maps in virtual patient-based CR education.

Methods:

Health professionals of different specialties, nationalities, and levels of experience in education individually created concept maps and afterwards reached a consensus on them in structured workshops. Then, medical students discussed the health professionals' concept maps in focus groups. We performed a qualitative content analysis of the transcribed audio records and field notes, and a descriptive comparison of the produced concept maps.

Results:

14 health professionals reached a consensus on four concept maps. In doing so, they discussed content and presentation of the concept maps, as well as rationales, and next steps. Overall, the structure of the workshops was well-received. The comparison of the produced concept maps showed that they varied widely in their scope and content. Consensus maps tended to be richer in content than individual ones. Nine medical students participated in two focus groups. Their opinions on the concept maps’ features varied widely, balancing between the wish for in-depth explanation and the flexibility of CR.

Conclusions:

Consensus workshops are a constructive method to create feedback concept maps that include different perspectives of health professionals with content that is useful to and accepted by students. Further research is needed to determine which features of feedback concept maps are most likely to improve learner outcomes and how to facilitate their construction in collaborative consensus workshops.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mayer A, Hege I, Kononowicz AA, Müller A, Sudacka M

Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e57331

DOI: 10.2196/57331

PMID: 39883032

PMCID: 11801104

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.