Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 21, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Fact or Fiction—Accelerometry Versus Self-Report in Adherence to Pediatric Concussion Protocols: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

DeMatteo C, Randall S, Jakubowski J, Stazyk K, Obeid J, Noseworthy M, Mazurek M, Timmons BW, Connolly J, Giglia L, Hall G, Lin CY, Perrotta S

Fact or Fiction—Accelerometry Versus Self-Report in Adherence to Pediatric Concussion Protocols: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024;7:e57325

DOI: 10.2196/57325

PMID: 39383478

PMCID: 11482736

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Fact or Fiction: Accelerometry versus Self-Report in Adherence to Pediatric Concussion Protocols, A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

  • Carol DeMatteo; 
  • Sarah Randall; 
  • Josephine Jakubowski; 
  • Kathy Stazyk; 
  • Joyce Obeid; 
  • Michael Noseworthy; 
  • Michael Mazurek; 
  • Brian W Timmons; 
  • John Connolly; 
  • Lucy Giglia; 
  • Geoffrey Hall; 
  • Chia-Yu Lin; 
  • Samantha Perrotta

ABSTRACT

Background:

Our research team developed evidence-based Return to Activity and Return to School protocols for youths with concussion which are based on the Sports Concussion Consensus statements and the main management strategy for concussion recovery.

Objective:

It is important to determine if youth with concussion adhere to these protocols before evaluation in randomized control trials. Youth who were more adherent would have a lower incidence of repeat injury, shorter times to Return to Activity and better outcomes in quality of life, mental health, and cognition measures.

Methods:

Participants were recruited from the Hospital Emergency Department, community referrals from their primary physician, and rehabilitation or sports medicine clinics. Youths (N=139) aged 5-18 with concussion. In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, self-reported symptoms and protocol stage of recovery were monitored every 48 hours until symptom resolution. Daily accelerometry data was collected. Participants were evaluated using a battery of measures at 3 time points. Participants were not blinded or randomized.

Results:

   For Return to Activity Stage 1, 13% of participants were adherent. 11% and 34% of participants were adherent for Stage 2 and 3, respectively. The median time to symptom-resolution for participants who self-reported adherence to the Return to Activity protocol was 13 days and 20 days for those who self-reported non-adherence (p=0.03). The re-injury rate among the cohort was 2% (N=3).  

Conclusions:

  Adherence to staged protocols post-concussion was minimal when assessed with accelerometers, but higher by self-report. More physical activity restrictions resulted in lower adherence. Although adherence was low, re-injury rate was low suggesting a protective effect of monitoring and Return to Activity protocols. The results of this study support an ease in protocols and earlier resumption of activities. 


 Citation

Please cite as:

DeMatteo C, Randall S, Jakubowski J, Stazyk K, Obeid J, Noseworthy M, Mazurek M, Timmons BW, Connolly J, Giglia L, Hall G, Lin CY, Perrotta S

Fact or Fiction—Accelerometry Versus Self-Report in Adherence to Pediatric Concussion Protocols: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024;7:e57325

DOI: 10.2196/57325

PMID: 39383478

PMCID: 11482736

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.