Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 18, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

In-Home Positioning for Remote Home Health Monitoring in Older Adults: Systematic Review

Chan A, Cai J, Qian L, Coutts B, Phan S, Gregson G, Lipsett M, Ríos Rincón A

In-Home Positioning for Remote Home Health Monitoring in Older Adults: Systematic Review

JMIR Aging 2024;7:e57320

DOI: 10.2196/57320

PMID: 39622026

PMCID: 11661402

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

In-Home Positioning for Remote Home Health Monitoring in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

  • Andrew Chan; 
  • Joanne Cai; 
  • Linna Qian; 
  • Brendan Coutts; 
  • Steven Phan; 
  • Geoff Gregson; 
  • Michael Lipsett; 
  • Adriana Ríos Rincón

ABSTRACT

Background:

With the growing proportion of Canadians over 65 years old, smart home and health monitoring technologies may help older adults to manage chronic disease and support aging-in-place. Localization technologies have been used to support management of frailty and dementia by detecting activities in the home.

Objective:

This systematic review aims to summarize the clinical evidence for in-home localization technologies, review the acceptability of monitoring, and summarize the range of technologies being used for in-home localization.

Methods:

PRISMA methodology was followed and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched with two reviewers performing screening, extractions and quality assessments.

Results:

A total of 1935 articles were found, with 36 technology-focused articles and 10 that reported on patient outcomes. From moderate to high quality studies, two studies reported mixed results on identifying mild cognitive dementia or frailty, while four studies reported mixed results on acceptability of localization technology. Technologies included ambient sensors, Bluetooth or Wifi received signal strength to localizer tags using RFID, UWB, Zigbee or GPS, and inertial measurement units with localizer tags.

Conclusions:

Clinical utility of localization remains mixed, with in-home sensors not being able to identify between older adults with healthy cognition from older adults with mild cognitive impairment. However, frailty was detectable using in-home sensors. Acceptability is moderately positive, particularly with ambient sensors. Localization technologies can achieve room detection accuracies up to 92% and linear accuracies of up to 5-20cm that may be promising for future clinical applications. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO (ID:CRD 42022339845)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chan A, Cai J, Qian L, Coutts B, Phan S, Gregson G, Lipsett M, Ríos Rincón A

In-Home Positioning for Remote Home Health Monitoring in Older Adults: Systematic Review

JMIR Aging 2024;7:e57320

DOI: 10.2196/57320

PMID: 39622026

PMCID: 11661402

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.