Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 6, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Telehealth Interventions in Pharmacy Practice: Systematic Review of Reviews and Recommendations

Chong LKR, Chan ASE, Lai YF

Telehealth Interventions in Pharmacy Practice: Systematic Review of Reviews and Recommendations

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e57129

DOI: 10.2196/57129

PMID: 40334268

PMCID: 12096025

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Telehealth Interventions in Pharmacy Practice: A Systematic Review of Reviews and Recommendations for Singapore

  • Lai Kay, Rachel Chong; 
  • Andrew Siang Ee Chan; 
  • Yi Feng Lai

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telehealth services have been increasingly adopted in recent years with advancement in technology and the Covid-19 pandemic being major drivers of this change.

Objective:

The aim of this systematic review of reviews was to consolidate existing literature on the impact of telehealth on future pharmacy practice and to analyze those already implemented in current pharmacy practice, with the objective of providing recommendations on how these interventions may be applied in the context of Singapore.

Methods:

The PRISMA framework was used to guide this review. Four databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library. Title, abstract and full text screening was performed and 18 reviews met the selection criteria. The search period was from April to August 2023. The quality of the reviews was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale and a GRADE-CERQual scale.

Results:

Based on the 18 identified reviews, telehealth interventions were categorized into: Teleconsultation, Telemonitoring, Telecollaboration, Telesupport. Teleconsultation was the most frequently utilized, followed by a combination of interventions, telesupport, telemonitoring and telecollaboration. Telephones were most common in teleconsultations and telemonitoring, while mobile, web or computer applications were most frequent in telesupport. A combination of methods was most commonly used to facilitate telecollaboration (eg. telephone, fax, electronic messaging, shared electronic records, video conferencing). The identified reviews were evaluated by health outcomes, hospital readmission rates, patient safety, adherence, satisfaction, pharmacist shortage, and quality and access to care. The use of telehealth in pharmacy has generally seen an improvement in overall outcomes compared to traditional pharmacy practice.

Conclusions:

Telehealth has shown promise in improving overall outcomes in pharmacy practice. The findings from this study can be used to inform future implementation of telehealth interventions in pharmacy, including in the context of Singapore.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chong LKR, Chan ASE, Lai YF

Telehealth Interventions in Pharmacy Practice: Systematic Review of Reviews and Recommendations

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e57129

DOI: 10.2196/57129

PMID: 40334268

PMCID: 12096025

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.