Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Biomedical Engineering

Date Submitted: Feb 1, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 16, 2024 - Apr 12, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 31, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach

Jeter R, Greenfield R, Housley SN, Belykh I

Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach

JMIR Biomed Eng 2024;9:e56980

DOI: 10.2196/56980

PMID: 39374054

PMCID: 11494252

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning-Based Residual Severity Classification

  • Russell Jeter; 
  • Raymond Greenfield; 
  • Stephen N. Housley; 
  • Igor Belykh

ABSTRACT

Background:

Stroke therapy is essential to reduce impairments and improve motor movements by engaging autogenous neuroplasticity. Utilizing machine learning and therapy session kinematic measurements promises to have a central role in rehabilitation decision-making in determining if patient therapy is improving.

Objective:

This study uses supervised learning methods to address a clinician’s autonomous classification of stroke residual severity labeled data towards improving in-home robotics-assisted stroke rehabilitation.

Methods:

Thirty-three stroke patients participate in in-home therapy sessions using the Motus Nova robotics rehabilitation technology to capture upper and lower body motion. The therapy session summary data is based on high-resolution movement and assistance data and clinician-informed discrete stroke residual severity labels. This arises from a final processed dataset of 32,902 patient sessions based on the maximum score per patient per session. Four machine learning algorithms are used to classify stroke residual severity: light gradient boosting, extra trees, deep neural networks, and classical logistic regression. Their performance measures are evaluated to identify which method maximizes stroke residual severity classification accuracy.

Results:

We demonstrate that the light gradient boosting method provides the most reliable autonomous detection of stroke severity.

Conclusions:

We show how objectively measured rehabilitation training paired with machine learning methods can be used to identify the residual stroke severity class with efforts to enhance in-home self-guided, individualized stroke rehabilitation. As data from rehabilitation practices are often of comparable size and nature to the data collected in our study, this suggests that the light gradient boosting method should be considered a standard, more efficient tool for this analysis.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jeter R, Greenfield R, Housley SN, Belykh I

Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach

JMIR Biomed Eng 2024;9:e56980

DOI: 10.2196/56980

PMID: 39374054

PMCID: 11494252

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.