Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 26, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 11, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Reporting Guidelines for the Early-Phase Clinical Evaluation of Applications Using Extended Reality: RATE-XR Qualitative Study Guideline

Vlake JH, Drop DLQ, Van Bommel J, Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Cipresso P, Rizzo AS, Rothbaum BO, Botella C, Hooft L, Bienvenu OJ, Jung C, Geerts B, Wils EJ, Birckhead BJ, Gommers D, van Genderen ME, RATE-XR expert group

Reporting Guidelines for the Early-Phase Clinical Evaluation of Applications Using Extended Reality: RATE-XR Qualitative Study Guideline

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e56790

DOI: 10.2196/56790

PMID: 39612482

PMCID: 11619188

Reporting guideline for the early-phase clinical evaluation of applications using extended reality: The RATE-XR Tutorial

  • Johan Hendrik Vlake; 
  • Denzel Laurence Quinten Drop; 
  • Jasper Van Bommel; 
  • Giuseppe Riva; 
  • Brenda Kay Wiederhold; 
  • Pietro Cipresso; 
  • Albert Skip Rizzo; 
  • Barbara Olasov Rothbaum; 
  • Cristina Botella; 
  • Lotty Hooft; 
  • Oscar Joseph Bienvenu; 
  • Christian Jung; 
  • Bart Geerts; 
  • Evert-Jan Wils; 
  • Brandon James Birckhead; 
  • Diederik Gommers; 
  • Michel Egide van Genderen; 
  • RATE-XR expert group

ABSTRACT

Background:

Extended reality (XR), encompassing technologies like virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), has rapidly gained prominence in healthcare. However, existing XR research often lacks rigor, proper controls, and standardization.

Objective:

To address this, we present the "Reporting for the early-phase clinical evaluation of applications using extended reality" (RATE-XR) guideline. RATE-XR is the result of a consensus-based, multi-stakeholder effort, aiming to enhance the transparency and quality of reporting in early-phase clinical evaluations of XR applications.

Methods:

We conducted a two-round modified Delphi process involving experts from diverse stakeholder categories.

Results:

The guideline comprises 17 XR-specific (made of 18 subitems) and 14 generic reporting items, each with a complementary Explanation & Elaboration (E&E) section in the Supplementary Note.

Conclusions:

The items encompass critical aspects of XR research, from clinical utility and safety to human factors and ethics. By offering a comprehensive checklist for reporting, the RATE-XR guideline facilitates robust assessment and replication of early-stage clinical XR studies. It underscores the need for transparency, patient-centeredness, and balanced evaluation of XR applications in healthcare. By providing an actionable checklist of minimal reporting items, this guideline will facilitate the responsible development and integration of XR technologies into healthcare and related fields.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Vlake JH, Drop DLQ, Van Bommel J, Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Cipresso P, Rizzo AS, Rothbaum BO, Botella C, Hooft L, Bienvenu OJ, Jung C, Geerts B, Wils EJ, Birckhead BJ, Gommers D, van Genderen ME, RATE-XR expert group

Reporting Guidelines for the Early-Phase Clinical Evaluation of Applications Using Extended Reality: RATE-XR Qualitative Study Guideline

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e56790

DOI: 10.2196/56790

PMID: 39612482

PMCID: 11619188

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.