Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 13, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 26, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness and Experiences of Quality Improvement Interventions in Older Adult Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review

RAHMAN JABIN MS, Samuriwo R, Chilaka M, Yaroson EV

Effectiveness and Experiences of Quality Improvement Interventions in Older Adult Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e56346

DOI: 10.2196/56346

PMID: 38635311

PMCID: 11066740

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A mixed-methods systematic review protocol of effectiveness and experiences of quality improvement interventions in the care of older individuals

  • MD SHAFIQUR RAHMAN JABIN; 
  • Ray Samuriwo; 
  • Marcus Chilaka; 
  • Emilia Vann Yaroson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Quality improvement (QI) interventions are designed to resolve the recurring challenges of care for older individuals, such as working conditions for staff, roles of older individuals in their own care and their families, and relevant stakeholders. Therefore, there is a need to map the impacts of QI interventions in older care settings and further improve health and social care systems associated with older adults.

Objective:

This review aims to compile and synthesise the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of policy and practice quality improvement (QI) interventions for the care of older individuals. The secondary aim is to understand the care of older individuals and QI intervention-related experiences and perspectives of stakeholders, care providers, older individuals, and their families.

Methods:

The review will follow the standard methodology used by Joanna Briggs Institute. The published studies will be searched through CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ASSIA and Web of Science, and the unpublished studies through Mednar, Trove, OCLC WorldCat, and Dissertations and Theses. This review included both qualitative and quantitative analyses of patients undergoing older care and any healthcare professionals involved in the care delivery for older adults; a broad range of QI interventions, including assistive technologies, effects of training and education, improved reporting, safety programs, and medical devices; the experiences and perspectives of staff and patients; the context of older care setting; and a broad range of outcomes, including patient safety.

Results:

A result-based convergent synthesis design will be used, and the standard procedure for reporting, i.e., PRISMA guidelines, will be followed.

Conclusions:

This comprehensive review is expected to reflect on insights into some quality improvement interventions and their impact, outline some common challenges of quality for older care, and benefit both the practical usefulness of care service activities and the society at large.


 Citation

Please cite as:

RAHMAN JABIN MS, Samuriwo R, Chilaka M, Yaroson EV

Effectiveness and Experiences of Quality Improvement Interventions in Older Adult Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e56346

DOI: 10.2196/56346

PMID: 38635311

PMCID: 11066740

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.