Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 12, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 28, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Finding Consensus on Trust in AI in Health Care: Recommendations From a Panel of International Experts

Starke G, Gille F, Termine A, Aquino YSJ, Chavarriaga R, Ferrario A, Hastings J, Jongsma K, Kellmeyer P, Kulynych B, Postan E, Racine E, Sahin D, Tomaszewska P, Vold K, Webb J, Facchini A, Ienca M

Finding Consensus on Trust in AI in Health Care: Recommendations From a Panel of International Experts

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e56306

DOI: 10.2196/56306

PMID: 39969962

PMCID: 11888049

Finding consensus on trust in AI in healthcare: recommendations from a panel of international experts

  • Georg Starke; 
  • Felix Gille; 
  • Alberto Termine; 
  • Yves Saint James Aquino; 
  • Ricardo Chavarriaga; 
  • Andrea Ferrario; 
  • Janna Hastings; 
  • Karin Jongsma; 
  • Philipp Kellmeyer; 
  • Bogdan Kulynych; 
  • Emily Postan; 
  • Elise Racine; 
  • Derya Sahin; 
  • Paulina Tomaszewska; 
  • Karina Vold; 
  • Jamie Webb; 
  • Alessandro Facchini; 
  • Marcello Ienca

ABSTRACT

Background:

Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare have emerged as a pivotal aspect of the ongoing digital transformation of health systems worldwide. Despite the potential benefits across diverse medical domains, one significant barrier to successful AI adoption remains prevailing low trust by users.

Objective:

Overcoming this challenge requires addressing complexities in defining trust and trustworthiness and applying these concepts to real-world medical scenarios. In response to these challenges and to foster warranted trust, this paper advocates for a more refined and nuanced conceptual understanding of trust in the context of AI in healthcare.

Methods:

Employing a combination of framework analysis and an iterative modified Delphi process involving international experts from diverse disciplines, we present and discuss a comprehensive consensus-based framework for trust in AI in healthcare. This framework is developed through the examination of five case studies encompassing diagnosis, clinical risk assessment, public health surveillance, assistive technology, and healthcare resource allocation.

Results:

Our analysis reveals that certain consequences of trust, such as user acceptance, and certain aspects of trustworthiness, such as system accuracy, are applicable across all discussed cases. However, a multitude of crucial aspects is case-specific, influenced by the respective system’s environment, involved actors, and pertinent framing factors.

Conclusions:

By synthesising insights into commonalities and differences from these case studies, this paper establishes a foundational basis for future debates and discussions on trust in medical AI. The outcomes of this analysis aim to inform the improvement of AI system design, adoption processes, and governance within the healthcare domain.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Starke G, Gille F, Termine A, Aquino YSJ, Chavarriaga R, Ferrario A, Hastings J, Jongsma K, Kellmeyer P, Kulynych B, Postan E, Racine E, Sahin D, Tomaszewska P, Vold K, Webb J, Facchini A, Ienca M

Finding Consensus on Trust in AI in Health Care: Recommendations From a Panel of International Experts

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e56306

DOI: 10.2196/56306

PMID: 39969962

PMCID: 11888049

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.