Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Jan 15, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 6, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adherence Patterns of Patients Using Remote Patient Management After Myocardial Infarction: Mixed Methods Persona Approach

Hondmann SM, Schrauwen L, Reijnders T, Stoop E, Evers AW, Visch VT, Atsma DE, Janssen VR

Adherence Patterns of Patients Using Remote Patient Management After Myocardial Infarction: Mixed Methods Persona Approach

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e56236

DOI: 10.2196/56236

PMID: 40855690

PMCID: 12360670

Adherence Patterns of Patients Using Remote Patient Management after Myocardial Infarction: A Mixed-Methods Persona Approach

  • Sara M Hondmann; 
  • Laura Schrauwen; 
  • Thomas Reijnders; 
  • Esmee Stoop; 
  • Andrea WM Evers; 
  • Valentijn T Visch; 
  • Douwe E Atsma; 
  • Veronica R Janssen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

Remote patient management (RPM) utilizing smartphone-enabled health monitoring devices (SHMDs) can be an effective, value-added part of cardiovascular care. However, cardiac patients’ adherence to RPM is variable. Personas can be used to understand the needs of the patient group and guide tailoring towards more personalized and effective eHealth intervention.

Objective:

Objective:

The aim of this study was to develop data-driven personas for myocardial infarction (MI) patients based on both quantitative and qualitative results.

Methods:

Methods:

This study employed a mixed methods design involving (1) database analysis of MI patient (N=261) SMHD usage data (blood pressure (BP), weight, step count) over the course of a one-year care track and (2) semi-structured interviews with MI patients (N=16) currently using SHMDs. Overall, 12-month adherence rates were calculated based on the number of weeks patients managed to perform the prescribed home measurements.

Results:

Results:

A cluster analysis was conducted on the self-monitoring data resulting in four distinctive usage-patterns labelled as: stiff starting (non-adherent in first week(s), 13% of users), temporary persisting (decreasing adherence, 24%), loyally persisting (continuously adherent, 26%), and negligent quitting (non-adherent, 37%). Health outcomes were analyzed based on these patterns. More adherent usage-patterns show better controlled BP when compared to less adherent usage-patterns, suggesting that adherence is associated with health outcomes. Patient experiences relating to each of the four distinctive usage-patterns were uncovered by means of semi-structured interviews, providing insight into user experiences and adherence factors most relevant for each of the groups. Thus, four distinct personas were developed by data collection, persona segmentation, and persona creation.

Conclusions:

Conclusion: This study identified four personas regarding usage and experiences of patients within an RPM care-track. Adherent patterns were characterized by improved BP and step count. These personas can guide future tailoring of eHealth interventions to maximize patient adherence.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hondmann SM, Schrauwen L, Reijnders T, Stoop E, Evers AW, Visch VT, Atsma DE, Janssen VR

Adherence Patterns of Patients Using Remote Patient Management After Myocardial Infarction: Mixed Methods Persona Approach

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e56236

DOI: 10.2196/56236

PMID: 40855690

PMCID: 12360670

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.