Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 8, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 29, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Time Efficiency, Reliability, and User Satisfaction of the Tooth Memo App for Recording Oral Health Information: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Detsomboonrat P, Pisarnturakit PP

Time Efficiency, Reliability, and User Satisfaction of the Tooth Memo App for Recording Oral Health Information: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e56143

DOI: 10.2196/56143

PMID: 38598287

PMCID: 11043928

Satisfaction and Capability of the Tooth Memo-an Application for Recording Oral Health Information: Cross-Sectional Study

  • Palinee Detsomboonrat; 
  • Pagaporn Pantuwadee Pisarnturakit

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digitalizing the data through an application (app) can help manage the extensive data from the Oral Health Survey. The Tooth Memo app collected data from oral health surveys and personal health information.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the Tooth Memo app's capability and users' satisfaction level.

Methods:

In the oral health surveys part of the Tooth Memo app, comparison of different data entry methods and evaluation of user satisfaction were evaluated. Three data recorders of different data entry methods entered patient’s information on DMFT (Decayed, Missing, and Filled tooth index) and CPI (Community Periodontal Index) from a reader who read aloud simultaneously. The time required for data entry, analysis, and summary of oral health survey data among three methods: (1) Pen-and-Paper (Manual), (2) IOS App, and (3) Android App were compared. The reliability was evaluated by percent disagreement and Kappa. The fifth-year dental students who collected the oral health survey data during their clinical work through the Tooth Memo evaluated their satisfaction with the Tooth Memo app after their clinical work. Lay people who were interested in recording their oral health information evaluated their satisfaction through a Likert scale questionnaire after trying to input their data with the Tooth Memo app. The satisfaction for those two parts was the same set of questions about the design, usage, and overall satisfaction.

Results:

Out of 103 dental records on DMFT and CPI, there are 177 missing data points (5.37%) in the Manual data entries, while there was no missing data on tooth status from Android, IOS, or CPI from any of the three methods. Transferring data from paper to computer took an average of 55 seconds per case. The manual method required 182 minutes more than the IOS or Android methods to clean the missing data, transfer, and analyze the data on tooth status from 103 patients. Users, 109 fifth-year dental students and 134 lay people, expressed high satisfaction with using the Tooth Memo app. The overall satisfaction of the Oral Health Survey ranged between 3 and 10, with an average (SD) of 7.86 (1.46). The overall satisfaction of the Personal Oral Health Record users ranged between 4 and 10, with an average (SD) of 8.09 (1.28).

Conclusions:

The Tooth Memo highlighted its superior capabilities to manual data entry. The user reported high satisfaction when using the app.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Detsomboonrat P, Pisarnturakit PP

Time Efficiency, Reliability, and User Satisfaction of the Tooth Memo App for Recording Oral Health Information: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e56143

DOI: 10.2196/56143

PMID: 38598287

PMCID: 11043928

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.