Exploring racial disparities in awareness and perceptions of oncology clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the mychoiceTM study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Black and African American (AA) adults are underrepresented in oncology clinical trials (CTs) in the US, despite efforts at narrowing this disparity.
Objective:
This study explores differences in how Black/AA oncology patients perceive CTs to improve support for the CT-participation decision-making process.
Methods:
As part of a larger randomized controlled trial, N=244 adult oncology patients receiving active treatment or follow-up care completed a cross-sectional baseline survey on sociodemographic characteristics, CT knowledge, health literacy, perceptions of cancer CTs, patient activation, patient advocacy, healthcare self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and CT intentions. Self-reported race was dichotomized into Black/AA and non-Black/AA. As appropriate, t-tests and chi-squared tests of independence were used to examine differences between groups.
Results:
Black/AA participants had lower CTs knowledge (p = .006), lower health literacy (p < .001), and more medical mistrust (p’s < .05) than non-Black/AA participants. While intentions to participate in a clinical trial, if offered, did not vary between Black/AA and non-Black/AA participants, Black/AA participants indicated lower awareness of CTs, fewer benefits of CTs, and more uncertainty around CT decision-making (p’s < .05). There were no differences for other variables.
Conclusions:
Despite no significant differences in intent to participate in a CT if offered and high overall trust in individual healthcare providers among both groups, beliefs persist about barriers to and benefits of CT participation among Black/AA patients. Findings highlight specific ways that education and resources about CTs could be tailored to better suit the informational and decision-making needs and preferences of Black/AA oncology patients.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.