Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Jan 12, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 12, 2024 - Jan 16, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 16, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Correction: Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study

Smayda KE, Cooper SH, Leyden K, Ulaszek J, Ferko N

Correction: Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2024;11:e56041

DOI: 10.2196/56041

PMID: 38382062

PMCID: 10918538

Correction: Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study

  • Kirsten Elisabeth Smayda; 
  • Sarah Hodsdon Cooper; 
  • Katie Leyden; 
  • Jackie Ulaszek; 
  • Nicole Ferko

ABSTRACT

Background:

Persistent walking impairment following a stroke is common. Although rehabilitative interventions exist, few exist for use at home in the chronic phase of stroke recovery. InTandem (MedRhythms, Inc) is a neurorehabilitation system intended to improve walking and community ambulation in adults with chronic stroke walking impairment.

Objective:

Using design best practices and human factors engineering principles, the research presented here was conducted to validate the safe and effective use of InTandem.

Methods:

In total, 15 participants in the chronic phase of stroke recovery (≥6 months after stroke) participated in this validation study. Participants were scored on 8 simulated use tasks, 4 kno wledge assessments, and 7 comprehension assessments in a simulated home environment. The number and types of use errors, close calls, and operational difficulties were evaluated. Analyses of task performances, participant behaviors, and follow-up interviews were conducted to determine the root cause of use errors and difficulties.

Results:

During this validation study, 93% (14/15) of participants were able to successfully complete the critical tasks associated with the simulated use of the InTandem system. Following simulated use task assessments, participants’ knowledge and comprehension of the instructions for use and key safety information were evaluated. Overall, participants were able to find and correctly interpret information in the materials in order to answer the knowledge assessment questions. During the comprehension assessment, participants understood warning statements associated with critical tasks presented in the instructions for use. Across the entire study, 3 “use errors” and 1 “success with difficulty” were recorded. No adverse events, including slips, trips, or falls, occurred in this study.

Conclusions:

In this validation study, people in the chronic phase of stroke recovery were able to safely and effectively use InTandem in the intended use environment. This validation study contributes to the overall understanding of residual use–related risks of InTandem in consideration of the established benefits.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Smayda KE, Cooper SH, Leyden K, Ulaszek J, Ferko N

Correction: Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2024;11:e56041

DOI: 10.2196/56041

PMID: 38382062

PMCID: 10918538

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.