Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Infodemiology

Date Submitted: Jan 4, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 10, 2024 - Mar 6, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 25, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Shifting Narratives in Media Coverage Across a Decade of Drug Discourse in the Philadelphia Inquirer: Qualitative Sentiment Analysis

Bouzoubaa L, Ehsani R, Chatterjee P, Rezapour R

Shifting Narratives in Media Coverage Across a Decade of Drug Discourse in the Philadelphia Inquirer: Qualitative Sentiment Analysis

JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e56004

DOI: 10.2196/56004

PMID: 40358987

PMCID: 12117267

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Shifting Narratives in Media Coverage: A Decade of Drug Discourse in The Philadelphia Inquirer

  • Layla Bouzoubaa; 
  • Ramtin Ehsani; 
  • Preetha Chatterjee; 
  • Rezvaneh Rezapour

ABSTRACT

Background:

The media has immense power in shaping public narratives surrounding sensitive topics like substance use. Its portrayals can unintentionally fuel harmful stereotypes and stigma, negatively impacting individuals struggling with addiction, influencing policy decisions, and hindering broader public health efforts.

Objective:

This study examines how the regional newspaper, The Philadelphia Inquirer, has covered events relating to illicit drug-use over time to highlight linguistic patterns and themes associated with specific types of substances.

Methods:

We collected a dataset of 157k articles published in the Philadelphia Inquirer over a ten-year period and analyzed articles that mention at least one commonly abused substance (4k). Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) methods, we extracted the most significant phrases mentioned in each distinct drug class on an annual basis and examined the sentiments around these aspects to provide insights into the shifting discourse within these articles over time.

Results:

Our analysis revealed that cannabis and narcotics were the most frequently discussed drug classes. Through our topic modeling approach, we unveiled that the predominant themes in drug-related discussions encompassed crime, legislative matters, medical considerations, and elements of pop culture. Our ABSA analysis highlighted that the majority of the extracted aspects were portrayed negatively within each drug class, reflecting a more punitive and stigmatizing portrayal in these news articles. Our study also unveiled shifts in the sentiment surrounding recurring aspects within certain drug classes over the years, indicating their evolution in response to changing political perspectives and the impact of real-world events on news coverage.

Conclusions:

Negative portrayals and punitive language in news outlets can fuel public stigma and discrimination towards individuals struggling with substance use disorders. This work sheds light on the predominant aspects surrounding associated with difference drug classes over a ten-year period, highlighting the lack of language that aligns with harm-reduction principles.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bouzoubaa L, Ehsani R, Chatterjee P, Rezapour R

Shifting Narratives in Media Coverage Across a Decade of Drug Discourse in the Philadelphia Inquirer: Qualitative Sentiment Analysis

JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e56004

DOI: 10.2196/56004

PMID: 40358987

PMCID: 12117267

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.