Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR AI

Date Submitted: Dec 30, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 9, 2024 - Mar 5, 2024
Date Accepted: May 6, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Toward Clinical Generative AI: Conceptual Framework

Bragazzi N, Garbarino S

Toward Clinical Generative AI: Conceptual Framework

JMIR AI 2024;3:e55957

DOI: 10.2196/55957

PMID: 38875592

PMCID: 11193080

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Towards a Clinical Generative Artificial Intelligence: Conceptual Framework

  • Nicola Bragazzi; 
  • Sergio Garbarino

ABSTRACT

Clinical decision-making is a crucial aspect of healthcare, involving the balanced integration of scientific evidence, clinical judgment, ethical considerations, and patient involvement. This process is dynamic and multifaceted, relying on clinicians' knowledge, experience, and intuitive understanding to achieve optimal patient outcomes through informed, evidence-based choices. The advent of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents a revolutionary opportunity in clinical decision-making. AI's advanced data analysis and pattern recognition capabilities can significantly enhance the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, processing vast medical data to identify patterns, tailor treatments, predict disease progression, and aid in proactive patient management. However, the incorporation of AI into clinical decision-making raises concerns regarding the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated insights. To address these concerns, eleven “verification paradigms” are here proposed, with each paradigm offering unique methods to verify the evidence-based nature of AI in clinical decision-making. The paper also frames the concept of “clinically explainable, fair, and responsible, clinician-, expert-, and patient-in-the-loop AI”. This model focuses on ensuring AI's comprehensibility, collaborative nature, and ethical grounding, advocating for AI to serve as an augmentative tool, with its decision-making processes being transparent and understandable to clinicians and patients. The integration of AI should enhance, not replace, the clinician’s judgment and should involve continuous learning and adaptation based on real-world outcomes and ethical and legal compliance. In conclusion, while generative AI holds immense promise in enhancing clinical decision-making, it is essential to ensure that it produces evidence-based, reliable, and impactful knowledge. Employing the outlined paradigms and approaches can help the medical and patient communities harness AI's potential while maintaining high patient care standards.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bragazzi N, Garbarino S

Toward Clinical Generative AI: Conceptual Framework

JMIR AI 2024;3:e55957

DOI: 10.2196/55957

PMID: 38875592

PMCID: 11193080

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.