Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Dec 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 2, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring the Potential of Electronic Patient-Generated Health Data for Evaluating Treatment Response to Intramuscular Steroids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Case Series

Al-Attar M, Assawamartbunlue K, Gandrup J, van der Veer SN, Dixon WG

Exploring the Potential of Electronic Patient-Generated Health Data for Evaluating Treatment Response to Intramuscular Steroids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Case Series

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55715

DOI: 10.2196/55715

PMID: 39467551

PMCID: 11555448

Evaluating treatment response to intramuscular steroids in rheumatoid arthritis: exploring the potential of electronic patient-generated health data

  • Mariam Al-Attar; 
  • Kesmanee Assawamartbunlue; 
  • Julie Gandrup; 
  • Sabine N van der Veer; 
  • William G Dixon

ABSTRACT

Background:

The increasing availability of mobile health devices presents exciting opportunities for remote collection of high frequency electronic patient-generated health data (ePGHD). This novel type of data has the potential to provide detailed insights into disease activity between clinical reviews and treatment response to clinical interventions, but its potential remains untapped due to the absence of established methodological approaches.

Objective:

This study aims to explore the feasibility of evaluating treatment response to intramuscular steroid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis using ePGHD collected using a smartphone app.

Methods:

We report a case-series of patients who collected ePGHD through use of a smartphone app for daily remote symptom tracking. We described their longitudinal pain-scores before and after intramuscular steroid injections. A baseline pain-score was calculated as a mean pain-score in the 10 days prior to the injection. This was compared to the pain-scores in the days following the injection. Response was defined as any improvement in the baseline score on the first day following the injection.

Results:

We included six patients who, between them, received nine steroid injections. Average pre-injection pain-scores ranged 3.3-9.3. Using our definitions, seven injections demonstrated response. Of the responders, duration of response ranged from 1-54 days (median 9); average pain-score improvement ranged from 0.1-5.3 (median 3.3); maximum pain-score improvement ranged from 0.1-7.0 (median 4.3).

Conclusions:

This case-series demonstrates the feasibility of using ePGHD to evaluate treatment response and is an important exploratory step towards developing more robust methodological approaches for analysis of this novel data type. Future analysis of ePGHD across a larger population is required to address issues highlighted by our analysis and to develop meaningful consensus definitions for treatment response in time-series data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Al-Attar M, Assawamartbunlue K, Gandrup J, van der Veer SN, Dixon WG

Exploring the Potential of Electronic Patient-Generated Health Data for Evaluating Treatment Response to Intramuscular Steroids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Case Series

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55715

DOI: 10.2196/55715

PMID: 39467551

PMCID: 11555448

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.