Previously submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (no longer under consideration since Sep 16, 2024)
Date Submitted: Dec 14, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Exploring Period Tracking Applications: A Geographical and Cultural Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Studies show an increasing global interest in period-tracking applications developed to aid women in monitoring and regulating their menstrual cycles. While these apps contribute to awareness and positive perspectives on reproductive health, limited attention has been given to exploring their geographical and cultural implications in existing studies.
Objective:
This scoping review aimed to examine existing literature on period tracking applications, focusing on their geographical and cultural dimensions. The study attempted to understand how geographical and cultural factors impact the applications' use and effectiveness.
Methods:
The review was conducted through a comprehensive search spanning scholarly databases for peer-reviewed journals and gray literature from 2013 to 2023. The findings were categorized by geographical location, revealing significant trends in cultural factors shaping the usage of period-tracking applications.
Results:
Of the 21 literatures reviewed, nine studies focused on understanding the usage of period-tracking applications in specific countries. Six studies utilized countries as study sites for exploring app functionalities and experience. Another six studies and two scoping reviews assessed functional implications and reviewed findings across different countries. The user demographic profile revealed that 12 out of 24 pieces of literature were primarily considered to be between 18 and 50 years old, with some including race, ethnicity, education, and digital literacy. A total of 44 period-monitoring applications were identified across various studies. However, 8.9% did not specify the application used and referred to it.
Conclusions:
This scoping review specifically examined the geographical and cultural dimensions of using period-tracking applications. It now opens avenues for future investigations into factors influencing diverse patterns, preferences, and practices in digital menstrual health.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.