Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Dec 14, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 6, 2024 - Nov 1, 2024
Date Accepted: May 16, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring the Impact of an Interactive Electronic Pegboard on Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Skills of Patients With Stroke: Preliminary Analysis

Chien SY, Wu CY, Wong AMK, Chen CK, Beckman SL

Exploring the Impact of an Interactive Electronic Pegboard on Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Skills of Patients With Stroke: Preliminary Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55481

DOI: 10.2196/55481

PMID: 39446480

PMCID: 11544338

Exploring the Impact of an Interactive Electronic Pegboard on Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Skills of Stroke Patients: A Preliminary Analysis

  • Shih-Ying Chien; 
  • Ching-Yi Wu; 
  • Alice May-Kuen Wong; 
  • Chih-Kuang Chen; 
  • Sara L Beckman

ABSTRACT

Background:

As individuals age, the incidence and mortality rates of cerebrovascular accidents significantly rise, leading to fine motor impairments and cognitive deficits that impact daily life. In modern occupational therapy, assessing manual dexterity and cognitive functions typically involves observation of patients interacting with physical objects. However, this pen-and-paper method is not only time-consuming, relying heavily on therapist involvement, but also often inaccurate.

Objective:

Digital assessment methods therefore have the potential to increase the accuracy of diagnosis as well as decrease the workload of healthcare professionals.

Methods:

This study examines the feasibility of an interactive electronic pegboard for the assessment and rehabilitation of stroke patients. We explored its clinical applicability by examining the relationship among stages, timing, and difficulty settings as well as their alignment with patient capabilities. Ten participants used a prototype of the pegboard for functional and task assessments; questionnaire interviews were conducted simultaneously to collect user feedback.

Results:

Results demonstrated that stroke patients consistently required more time to complete tasks than expected, significantly deviating from the initial timeframes. Additionally, the participants exhibited a slight reduction in performance levels in both manual dexterity and cognitive abilities. Insights from questionnaire responses revealed that the majority of participants found the prototype interface easy and enjoyable to use, with good functionality.

Conclusions:

This preliminary investigation supports the efficacy of interactive electronic pegboards for the rehabilitation of the hand functions of patients as well as training their attentional and cognitive abilities. This digital technology could potentially alleviate the burden of healthcare workers, positioning it as a valuable and intelligent precision healthcare tool. Clinical Trial: The research protocol underwent rigorous scrutiny and received approval from the Research Ethics Board of Chang Gung Hospital (Reference No: IRB/REC No: 202301197A3).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chien SY, Wu CY, Wong AMK, Chen CK, Beckman SL

Exploring the Impact of an Interactive Electronic Pegboard on Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Skills of Patients With Stroke: Preliminary Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55481

DOI: 10.2196/55481

PMID: 39446480

PMCID: 11544338

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.