Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 8, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 8, 2023 - Feb 2, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 24, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinical Decision Support and Natural Language Processing in Medicine: Systematic Literature Review

Eguia H, Sánchez-Bocanegra C, Vinciarelli F, Alvarez-Lopez F, Saigí-Rubió F

Clinical Decision Support and Natural Language Processing in Medicine: Systematic Literature Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55315

DOI: 10.2196/55315

PMID: 39348889

PMCID: 11474138

Clinical Decision Support and Natural Language Processing in Medicine: Systematic Literature Review

  • Hans Eguia; 
  • Carlos Sánchez-Bocanegra; 
  • Franco Vinciarelli; 
  • Fernando Alvarez-Lopez; 
  • Francesc Saigí-Rubió

ABSTRACT

Background:

Ensuring access to accurate and verified information is essential for effective patient treatment and diagnosis. Although health workers rely on the Internet for clinical data, there is a need for a more streamlined approach.

Objective:

This systematic review aims to assess the current state of Artificial Intelligence and natural language processing techniques in healthcare to identify their potential use in electronic health records and automated information searches.

Methods:

A search was conducted in the PubMed, Excerpta Medica (EMBASE) and ScienceDirect (Elsevier) online databases for articles published between January 2000 and April 2023. The only inclusion criteria were (1) original research articles and studies on the application of Artificial Intelligence-based medical clinical decision support using natural language-processing techniques and (2) limited to publication in English. A Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess the quality of the studies.

Results:

The search yielded 466 articles, from which 23 studies were included (21 original articles and two systematic reviews). Of the evaluated articles, 18 of the included studies explained the use of natural language processing as a source of data collection, 15 articles used electronic health records as a data source and a further six were based on clinical data. Only four of the articles showed the use of combined strategies for natural language processing to obtain clinical data. Thirteen articles presented standalone data review algorithms. The other studies showed that the clinical decision support system alternative was also a way of displaying the information obtained for immediate clinical use.

Conclusions:

The use of natural language processing engines can be used effectively to obtain results that could allow the development of more accurate clinical decision systems. Furthermore, the use of biphasic tools using Artificial Intelligence criteria as algorithms combined with human criteria may improve the flow of clinical diagnosis/treatment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Eguia H, Sánchez-Bocanegra C, Vinciarelli F, Alvarez-Lopez F, Saigí-Rubió F

Clinical Decision Support and Natural Language Processing in Medicine: Systematic Literature Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55315

DOI: 10.2196/55315

PMID: 39348889

PMCID: 11474138

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.