Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 7, 2023
Date Accepted: May 9, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Antibiotic Prescribing by Digital Health Care Providers as Compared to Traditional Primary Health Care Providers: Cohort Study Using Register Data

Wallman A, Svärdsudd K, Bobits K, Wallman T

Antibiotic Prescribing by Digital Health Care Providers as Compared to Traditional Primary Health Care Providers: Cohort Study Using Register Data

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55228

DOI: 10.2196/55228

PMID: 38924783

PMCID: 11237768

Antibiotic Prescribing by Digital Healthcare Providers as Compared to Traditional Primary Healthcare Providers: a Register study

  • Andy Wallman; 
  • Kurt Svärdsudd; 
  • Kent Bobits; 
  • Thorne Wallman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine” increases worldwide and is changing the map of Primary Health Care (PHC). Virtual care has increased for the last decade and by the ongoing Covid-19 epidemy, patients’ use of virtual care has increased even further. In Sweden, Virtual care meetings are a part of the government supported healthcare today, and there are several digital care providers on the Swedish market, which makes it possible to get in touch with a doctor within a few minutes. The fast expansion of this market has raised questions about the quality of primary care provided in a virtual setting. Antibiotic prescribing is a common treatment in primary health care.

Objective:

To compare antibiotic prescribing between digital primary healthcare (PHC) providers (Internet-PHC) and traditional physical PHC providers (Physical-PHC), and to determine whether prescriptions for specific diagnoses differed between Internet-PHC and Physical-PHC appointments, adjusted for the effects of attained age, sex, and time relative to the COVID-19 pandemic

Methods:

Antibiotic prescribing data based on ATC codes were obtained for Region Sörmland residents from January 2020 until March 2021 from the Regional Administrative Office. Prescriptions issued by Internet-PHC or Physical-PHC physicians were considered. Information on appointment date, staff category serving the patient, ICD-10 diagnosis codes, ATC codes of prescribed medicines, and patient age and sex was used.

Results:

A total of 160 238 healthcare appointments were registered, of which 18 433 led to an infection diagnosis. Antibiotics with the ATC codes J01A–J01X were prescribed in 9.3% of Physical-PHC appointments as compared to 6.1% of Internet-PHC appointments. In addition, 61.3% of Physical-PHC infection appointments resulted in antibiotic prescriptions, as compared to only 25.7% of Internet-PHC appointments. The odds ratio of receiving an antibiotic prescription during an Internet-PHC appointment was 0.23–0.39 as compared to a Physical-PHC appointment.

Conclusions:

Physicians prescribe far fewer antibiotics during Internet-PHC appointments than during Physical-PHC appointments.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wallman A, Svärdsudd K, Bobits K, Wallman T

Antibiotic Prescribing by Digital Health Care Providers as Compared to Traditional Primary Health Care Providers: Cohort Study Using Register Data

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55228

DOI: 10.2196/55228

PMID: 38924783

PMCID: 11237768

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.