Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 28, 2023
Date Accepted: May 27, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Potential, Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Multicenter Mixed Methods Study in Routine Cystic Fibrosis Care

Oppelaar MC, Emond Y, Bannier MA, Reijers MH, van der Vaart H, van der Meer R, Altenburg J, Conemans L, Rottier B, Nuijsink M, van den Wijngaart LS, Merkus PJ, Heinen M, Roukema J

Potential, Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Multicenter Mixed Methods Study in Routine Cystic Fibrosis Care

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e54942

DOI: 10.2196/54942

PMID: 39106098

PMCID: 11336494

Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Remote Monitoring in Chronic Respiratory Diseases – A Multicentre Mixed-Methods Study in Routine Cystic Fibrosis Care.

  • Martinus Cornelis Oppelaar; 
  • Yvette Emond; 
  • Michiel AGE Bannier; 
  • Monique HE Reijers; 
  • Hester van der Vaart; 
  • Renske van der Meer; 
  • Josje Altenburg; 
  • Lennart Conemans; 
  • Bart Rottier; 
  • Marianne Nuijsink; 
  • Lara S van den Wijngaart; 
  • Peter JFM Merkus; 
  • Maud Heinen; 
  • Jolt Roukema

ABSTRACT

Background:

Current literature inadequately addresses to what extent remote monitoring should integrate in care models of chronic respiratory diseases (CRD).

Objective:

This study evaluated a remote monitoring programme (RMP) in cystic fibrosis (CF) by exploring experiences, future perspectives, and use behaviour during three years with the aim to develop future directions for remote monitoring in CRD.

Methods:

Mixed-methods, multicentre, observational study in five Dutch CF centres. Self-designed questionnaires were sent out to people with CF who had a minimum of 12 months experience with the RMP and local healthcare professionals (HCPs). Questionnaire outcomes were used to inform semi-structured interviews in HCP and pwCF. Anonymous data on use frequency of all pwCF was analysed.

Results:

24 (69%) HCPs and 72 (89%) pwCF responded to the questionnaire, 7 HCP and 12 pwCF participated in semi-structured interviews. Both pwCF and HCP were positive about remote monitoring in CF care. Benefits ranged from supporting individual patients, to reducing healthcare consumption. Downsides included negative psychosocial effects and the potential to lose sight of patients. Future perspectives were centred around creating hybrid care models, personalising remote care, and balancing individual benefits with monitoring burden.

Conclusions:

Remote monitoring has considerable potential in supporting pwCF and HCPs within the CF care model. We identified four practice-based future directions for remote monitoring in CF and CRD care. The strategies, ranging from patient-driven to prediction-driven, can help clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers to navigate the rapidly changing digital health field, to integrate remote monitoring in local care models, and to align remote care with patient and clinician needs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Oppelaar MC, Emond Y, Bannier MA, Reijers MH, van der Vaart H, van der Meer R, Altenburg J, Conemans L, Rottier B, Nuijsink M, van den Wijngaart LS, Merkus PJ, Heinen M, Roukema J

Potential, Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Multicenter Mixed Methods Study in Routine Cystic Fibrosis Care

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e54942

DOI: 10.2196/54942

PMID: 39106098

PMCID: 11336494

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.