Previously submitted to: JMIR Human Factors (no longer under consideration since Mar 19, 2024)
Date Submitted: Nov 23, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Perspectives of physicians treating lung cancer patients on the clinical use of outcomes: A qualitative study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in scales can help personalise patient care pathways, including the frequency and type of clinical review (face-to-face visits, phone calls, or video calls). We aimed to elucidate the perception of the outcomes of physicians who treat lung cancer patients and the impact they have on their quality of life through questionnaires, and to establish relationships (related to the patient, the social and family environment, and the diagnosis and treatment), in addition to relating them to multidimensional aspects of the patient’s experience. Additionally, we also identified barriers and facilitators to using the outcome measures.
Objective:
Our primary objective was to clarify the perceptions of physicians treating lung cancer patients regarding outcomes and their impact on the patient’s quality of life. We also sought to explore PROMs. We categorised them considering the multidimensional aspects of the patient’s experience while identifying the barriers and facilitators to using these outcome measures.
Methods:
We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews via videoconferencing. The interviews focused on collecting expert opinions on physicians’ perceptions of their patient’s outcomes and the most relevant risk variables. A qualitative thematic analysis was performed.
Results:
Three primary groups were identified in the interview analysis: patient-related, social and family environment, and diagnosis and treatment. No direct relationship was discovered between the perception of outcomes by physicians and experiences of patients and caregivers.
Conclusions:
PROMs need to be implemented in the daily routine of clinical care because physicians generally focus on clinical outcomes rather than patient-centred outcomes, their experiences, and needs. The digitisation of PROMs can facilitate their use. We conclude that barriers and facilitators are a form of methodological division because, in reality, what we perceive as barriers can also be facilitators, depending on several factors, such as health literacy, digital literacy, and socioeconomic level. The use of PROMs is relevant, provided there is feedback, and the outcomes are subsequently managed with the patient. Digitalising PROMs (ePROMs) and videoconferencing or telemedicine could improve these situations. However, this type of digital instrument cannot address some dimensions that measure the need for a different approach, such as spiritual care for end-of-life patients. Thus, physicians can focus their attention on each patient. Clinical Trial: Not
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.