Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Nov 16, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 15, 2023 - Jan 10, 2024
Date Accepted: Dec 22, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Benefits, Recruitment, Dropout, and Acceptability of the Strength Back Digital Health Intervention for Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: Nonrandomized, Qualitative, and Quantitative Pilot Feasibility Study

van der Horst AY, Meijer LS, van Os - Medendorp H, Jukema JS, Bohlmeijer ET, Schreurs KM, Kelders SM

Benefits, Recruitment, Dropout, and Acceptability of the Strength Back Digital Health Intervention for Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: Nonrandomized, Qualitative, and Quantitative Pilot Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e54600

DOI: 10.2196/54600

PMID: 38324374

PMCID: 10882475

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A non-randomized pilot feasibility study into Strength Back: a digital health intervention for spinal surgery patients – benefits, recruitment, drop-out and acceptability

  • Annemieke Y. van der Horst; 
  • Laura S.E.M. Meijer; 
  • Harmieke van Os - Medendorp; 
  • Jan S. Jukema; 
  • Ernst T. Bohlmeijer; 
  • Karlein M.G. Schreurs; 
  • Saskia M. Kelders

ABSTRACT

Background:

Spinal surgery patients report high levels of insecurity, pain, stress and anxiety, before and after surgery. A digital health intervention, based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and positive psychology has been developed to enhance psychological flexibility and well-being and to reduce postsurgical pain.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to assess 1) the feasibility of a future RCT of the digital intervention called “Strength Back” in terms of benefits, recruitment and drop-out and 2) the acceptability of the intervention.

Methods:

We used a non-randomized experimental design with an intervention group (n=17) and a control group (n=20). Outcome measures were pain intensity (NRS), pain interference (MPI), anxiety and depression (HADS), valued living (ELS), psychological flexibility (PIPS), and mental well-being (MHC-SF). Semi-structured interviews in combination with log data and scores on the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale (TWEETS) were used to assess acceptability.

Results:

A significant improvement over time on emotional and overall well-being (MHC-SF) was only found for the intervention group (resp. V = 99, p = .026; V = 55, p = .004). In addition, the intervention group showed a significantly larger decline in pain intensity (NRS) than the control group (U = 75, p = .003). On average 75% of the available weekly modules were completed and 68% of the participants used the intervention until the final interview. The majority of the participants (n=15) in the intervention group would recommend the intervention to future patients.

Conclusions:

The current study shows that combining ACT and PP in a digital intervention such as Strength Back is promising for spinal surgery patients. A larger RCT is now warranted.


 Citation

Please cite as:

van der Horst AY, Meijer LS, van Os - Medendorp H, Jukema JS, Bohlmeijer ET, Schreurs KM, Kelders SM

Benefits, Recruitment, Dropout, and Acceptability of the Strength Back Digital Health Intervention for Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: Nonrandomized, Qualitative, and Quantitative Pilot Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e54600

DOI: 10.2196/54600

PMID: 38324374

PMCID: 10882475

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.