Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Apr 11, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 5, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Early in-bed cycle ergometry with critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients - Statistical Analysis Plan for CYCLE (Critical care cycling to improve lower extremity strength), an international, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Survivors of critical illness are at risk of developing physical dysfunction following intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. ICU-based rehabilitation interventions, such as early-in bed cycle ergometry, may improve patients’ short-term physical function. CYCLE (Critical care cycling to improve lower extremity strength) is a 360-patient, international, multi-center, open-label, parallel group randomized control trial (1:1 ratio) with blinded primary outcome assessment at 3 days post-ICU discharge.
Objective:
Before unblinding and trial database lock, we describe a prespecified statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the CYCLE RCT.
Methods:
The CYCLE principal investigator and statisticians prepared this SAP with approval by the steering committee and coinvestigators. The SAP defines the primary and secondary outcomes (including adverse events), and describes the planned, primary, secondary, and subgroup analyses.
Results:
The primary outcome for the CYCLE trial is the Physical Function Intensive Care Unit Test-scored (PFIT-s) at 3 days post-ICU discharge. The PFIT-s is a reliable and valid performance-based measure. We plan to use a frequentist statistical framework for all analyses. We will conduct a linear regression to analyze the primary outcome, including randomization as an independent variable, adjusting for age ( 65 years versus <65 years) and center. We will report the regression results as mean difference in PFIT-s with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. We consider a 1-point difference in PFIT-s score as clinically important. We plan 3 subgroup analyses including age (≥65 versus <65 years), frailty (Baseline Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5 versus <5) and sex (male versus female).
Conclusions:
We developed and present an SAP for the CYCLE RCT and will adhere to it for all analyses. This study will add to the growing body of evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of ICU-based rehabilitation interventions. Clinical Trial: NCT03471247 (Full RCT); NCT02377830 (CYCLE Vanguard 46 patient internal pilot)
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.