Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Nov 3, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 28, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effects of Telemedicine on Informal Caregivers of Patients in Palliative Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yang X, Li X, Jiang S, Yu X

Effects of Telemedicine on Informal Caregivers of Patients in Palliative Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e54244

DOI: 10.2196/54244

PMID: 38602303

PMCID: 11024400

Effects of Telemedicine on Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Xiaoyu Yang; 
  • Xueting Li; 
  • Shanshan Jiang; 
  • Xinying Yu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telemedicine technology is a rapidly developing field that demonstrates immense potential in improving medical services. In palliative care, informal caregivers assume the primary responsibility in patient care and often face challenges such as increased physical and mental stress, and declining health. In such cases, telemedicine interventions can provide support and improve their health outcomes. However, research findings regarding the use of telemedicine among informal caregivers are controversial, and its efficacy remains unclear.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of telemedicine on managing the burden, anxiety, depression, and quality of life of informal caregivers of palliative care.

Methods:

A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, CBM, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs)published from inception to March 2023. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted relevant information. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Intervention effects were estimated and sensitivity analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4, while 95% prediction intervals (PI) were calculated using R (version 4.3.2) and RStudio.

Results:

Nine RCTs were included in this study. The meta-analysis indicated that telemedicine has reduced the caregiving burden (SMD −0.49; 95% CI −0.72 to −0.27; P<.001; PI −0.86 to −0.13) and anxiety (SMD −0.23; 95% CI −0.40 to −0.06; P=.009; PI −0.98 to 0.39) of informal caregivers; however, it did not affect depression (SMD −0.21; 95% CI -0.47 to 0.05; P=.11; PI −0.94 to 0.51) or quality of life (SMD 0.35; 95% CI −0.20 to 0.89; P=.21; PI −2.15 to 2.85).

Conclusions:

While telemedicine can alleviate the caregiving burden and anxiety of informal caregivers, it does not significantly reduce depression or improve their quality of life. Further high-quality, large-sample studies are needed to validate the effects of telemedicine. Furthermore, personalized intervention programs based on theoretical foundations are required to support caregivers. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO CRD42023415688; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=415688


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yang X, Li X, Jiang S, Yu X

Effects of Telemedicine on Informal Caregivers of Patients in Palliative Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e54244

DOI: 10.2196/54244

PMID: 38602303

PMCID: 11024400

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.