Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 31, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 31, 2023 - Dec 26, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 23, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Blended Learning Course on the Diagnostics of Mental Disorders: Multicenter Cluster Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Bonnin G, Kröber S, Schneider S, Margraf J, Pflug V, Gerlach AL, Slotta T, Christiansen H, Albrecht B, Chavanon ML, Hirschfeld G, In-Albon T, Thielsch MT, von Brachel R

A Blended Learning Course on the Diagnostics of Mental Disorders: Multicenter Cluster Randomized Noninferiority Trial

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e54176

DOI: 10.2196/54176

PMID: 39602218

PMCID: 11635323

A blended learning course on the diagnostics of mental disorders: multicenter cluster randomized non-inferiority trial

  • Gabriel Bonnin; 
  • Svea Kröber; 
  • Silvia Schneider; 
  • Jürgen Margraf; 
  • Verena Pflug; 
  • Alexander L. Gerlach; 
  • Timo Slotta; 
  • Hanna Christiansen; 
  • Björn Albrecht; 
  • Mira-Lynn Chavanon; 
  • Gerrit Hirschfeld; 
  • Tina In-Albon; 
  • Meinald T. Thielsch; 
  • Ruth von Brachel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Clinical diagnoses determine if and how therapists treat their patients. As misdiagnoses can have severe adverse effects, disseminating evidence-based diagnostic skills into clinical practice is highly important.

Objective:

Therefore, we developed and evaluated a blended learning course in a multicenter cluster randomized trial.

Methods:

Undergraduate psychology students (N=350) enrolled in eighteen university courses at three universities. The courses were randomly assigned to blended learning or traditional synchronous teaching. The primary outcome was the participants’ performance in a clinical diagnostic interview after the courses, secondary outcomes were diagnostic knowledge and participants’ reactions to the courses. All outcomes were analyzed on the individual participant level using non-inferiority testing.

Results:

Compared to the synchronous course (74.6% pass rate), participation in the blended learning course (89.0% pass rate) increased the likelihood of successfully passing the behavioral test, OR=2.77 (95% CI [1.55, 5.13]), indicating not only non- inferiority, but superiority of the blended learning course. Furthermore, participants in the blended learning course did not perform worse than participants in the synchronous course on the diagnostic knowledge test and several reaction measures.

Conclusions:

Blended learning can help to improve the diagnostic skills and knowledge of (future) clinicians and thus make an important contribution to improving mental health care. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05294094 Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05294094


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bonnin G, Kröber S, Schneider S, Margraf J, Pflug V, Gerlach AL, Slotta T, Christiansen H, Albrecht B, Chavanon ML, Hirschfeld G, In-Albon T, Thielsch MT, von Brachel R

A Blended Learning Course on the Diagnostics of Mental Disorders: Multicenter Cluster Randomized Noninferiority Trial

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e54176

DOI: 10.2196/54176

PMID: 39602218

PMCID: 11635323

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.