Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Nov 1, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 14, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Japanese Perception of Brain Death and Implications for Communicating New Medical Technologies: Quantitative and Qualitative Social Media Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Brain death has been used to decide whether to keep sustained care and treatment, and it can facilitate tissue, organ, and body donation for several purposes, such as transplantation and medical education and research. In the case of Japan, brain death counts with a strict diagnosis criterion and family consent is crucial, but it has been a challenging concept for the public since its introduction, including knowledge and communication issues.
Objective:
We analysed data across Japanese YouTube and Twitter to uncover actors and quality of brain death communication, providing recommendations to communicate new medical technologies.
Methods:
Using the keyword “脳死”(brain death), we collected recent data from YouTube and Twitter, classifying it into five dimensions: time, individuality (type of users), place, activity, and relations (hyperlinks). We employed a scale to evaluate brain death information quality and divided YouTube videos in three groups and assessed their differences through statistical analysis. We also provided a text-based analysis of brain death-related narratives.
Results:
Most videos (20/61, 32.78%) were uploaded in 2019, while 10,892 Tweets peaked between July 3 and 9, and June 12 and 18 of 2023. Citizens uploaded most (18, 27.27%) videos about brain death, followed by media (13, 19.69%) and unknown actors (10, 15.15%), whereas most identified users in a random sample of 100 Tweets were citizens (73%) and top 10 retweeted and liked Tweets were also mostly authored by citizens (75%). There was a significant difference in unknown locations (F(1.22, 5.72) = [6.20], p = .002), suggesting that information quality in such places was high in YouTube, whereas no specific information on locations was uncovered in Twitter. Information videos contained guides for accreditation of the National Nursing Exam and religious points of view, while Misinformation videos mostly contained promotions by spirituality actors and webtoon artists, and some Tweets versed on heart transplantation and patient narratives. Most hyperlinks pointed to YouTube and Twitter.
Conclusions:
Brain death has become a common topic in everyday life, with some actors disseminating high-quality information, others no medical information, and others misinformation. Recommendations include partnering with interested actors, discussing medical information in detail, and teaching people to recognize pseudoscience.
Citation
The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.