Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 27, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 27, 2023 - Dec 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patterns and Perceptions of Standard Order Set Use Among Physicians Working Within a Multihospital System: Mixed Methods Study

Naicker S, Tariq A, Donovan R, Magon H, White N, Simmons J, McPhail S

Patterns and Perceptions of Standard Order Set Use Among Physicians Working Within a Multihospital System: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e54022

DOI: 10.2196/54022

PMID: 39514274

PMCID: 11584534

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patterns and perceptions of standard order set use across a multi-hospital system

  • Sundresan Naicker; 
  • Amina Tariq; 
  • Raelene Donovan; 
  • Honor Magon; 
  • Nicole White; 
  • Joshua Simmons; 
  • Steven McPhail

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic standard order sets automate ordering of specific treatment, testing and investigative protocols by physicians. Despite their routine implementation within Electronic Medical Records (EMRs), little is understood regarding how they are used and what are the factors’ that influence their adoption in practice.

Objective:

This study aimed to i) describe patterns of use of standard order sets within a multi-hospital healthcare system; and ii) explore and map clinicians’ perceptions of use to a behavioural model (COM-B).

Methods:

Quantitative data on standard order sets use from five hospitals was captured over five-month intervals for three years (2019, 2020, 2021). Qualitative Data comprising of unstructured and semi-structured interviews (n=15) was collected and analysed using a reflexive thematic approach. Interview themes were then mapped to a theory-informed model of behaviour change (COM-B) to identify determinants of use in routine clinical practice.

Results:

Total count of standard order sets use across the health system in the 2019 observation period was 267 253, increasing to 293 950 and 335 066 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. There was a change in use toward specialty order sets that had received upgrades in the study period. There were four emergent themes related to order set use derived from clinician interviews: i) Knowledge and Skills; ii) Perceptions; iii) Technical Dependencies; and iv) Unintended Consequences which were mapped to the COM-B model. Findings suggest a user preference for customised order sets, in response to local context and user experience.

Conclusions:

Sustained and continuous uptake for appropriate CPOE use may require implementation strategies associated with capability, opportunity, and motivational influencers of behaviour. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Naicker S, Tariq A, Donovan R, Magon H, White N, Simmons J, McPhail S

Patterns and Perceptions of Standard Order Set Use Among Physicians Working Within a Multihospital System: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e54022

DOI: 10.2196/54022

PMID: 39514274

PMCID: 11584534

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.