JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a pressing need to understand the implications of the rapid adoption of virtual primary care for people with opioid use disorder. Potential impacts, including disruptions to opiate agonist therapies, and the prospect of improved service accessibility remain underexplored. This scoping review synthesizes current literature on virtual primary care for people with opioid use disorder, with a specific focus on benefits, challenges, and strategies.

Objective:

This scoping review synthesizes current literature on virtual primary care for people with opioid use disorder, with a specific focus on benefits, challenges, and strategies.

Methods:

We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological approach for scoping reviews and reported our findings consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We conducted searches on MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and Embase using our developed search strategy with no date restrictions. We incorporated all study types that included the three concepts (i.e., virtual care; primary care; people with opioid use disorder). We excluded research on minors, asynchronous virtual modalities, and care not provided in a primary care setting. We used Covidence to screen and extract data, pulling information on study characteristics, health system features, patient outcomes, and challenges and benefits of virtual primary care. We conducted inductive content analysis and calculated descriptive statistics. We appraised the quality of studies using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies tool and categorized findings using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science.

Results:

Our search identified 1474 studies. We removed 536 duplicates, leaving 936 studies for title and abstract screening. After a double review process, we retained 28 studies for extraction. Most studies described virtual primary care delivered via phone (n=18, 64.3%) rather than video. While increased healthcare accessibility was a significant benefit (n=13, 46.4%) to the adoption of virtual visits, issues around access to technology and digital literacy stood out as the main challenge (n=12, 42.9%).

Conclusions:

The available studies highlight the potential for enhancing accessibility and continuous access care for people with opioid use disorder using virtual modalities. Future research and policies must focus on bridging gaps to ensure virtual primary care does not exacerbate or entrench health inequities. Clinical Trial: We registered our scoping review protocol on Open Science Framework (DOI number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y7QUG).