Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 24, 2023
Date Accepted: Apr 3, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Chinese Oncologists’ Perspectives on Integrating AI into Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Xiong X

Chinese Oncologists’ Perspectives on Integrating AI into Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e53918

DOI: 10.2196/53918

PMID: 38838307

PMCID: 11187515

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Concerns on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: A Survey of Chinese Oncologists' Perspectives

  • XiaoMin Xiong

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential in augmenting oncology care and has been deployed in Chinese hospitals.

Objective:

Objective:This study aims to investigate the concerns of Chinese oncologists regarding the integration of AI into clinical practice, and identifies the factors that shape these concerns.

Methods:

Methods:

A total of 228 Chinese oncologists participated in a cross-sectional online survey. The survey gauges their views and worries about AI. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and both univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to find correlations between the oncologists' backgrounds and their concerns.

Results:

Results:

The study revealed the most prominent concerns to be the potential for AI to mislead diagnosis and treatment (71.49%), an over-reliance on AI (71.05%), data and algorithm bias (53.95%), issues with data security and patient privacy (53.95%), and a lag in the adaptation of laws, regulations, and policies in keeping up with AI's development (50.44%). Oncologists with a bachelor’s degree expressed heightened concerns related to data and algorithm bias (69.39%) and the lagging nature of legal, regulatory, and policy issues (65.31%), with p-values of 0.034 and 0.046 respectively. Opinions regarding the possibility of AI replacing doctors were diverse, with 23.25% strongly disagreeing, 14.04% disagreeing, 29.82% neutral, 16.23% agreeing, and 16.67% strongly agreeing. In terms of AI's potential impact on doctor-patient relationships, a majority (53.07%) believed it would be beneficial, but 9.21% speculated it could escalate disputes.

Conclusions:

Conclusions:

Addressing these concerns through the collaboration of stakeholders is key for responsible and effective AI integration in oncology. The benefits of AI must be balanced with ethics and human values. Educating doctors on AI's benefits and risks can build trust and ensure responsible use. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Xiong X

Chinese Oncologists’ Perspectives on Integrating AI into Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e53918

DOI: 10.2196/53918

PMID: 38838307

PMCID: 11187515

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.