Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Apr 16, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing the Content and Effect of Web-Based Decision Aids for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yu L, Gong J, Sun X, Zang M, Liu L, Yu S

Assessing the Content and Effect of Web-Based Decision Aids for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e53872

DOI: 10.2196/53872

PMID: 38801766

PMCID: 11165285

Web-based decision aids for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Lin Yu; 
  • Jianmei Gong; 
  • Xiaoting Sun; 
  • Min Zang; 
  • Lei Liu; 
  • Shengmiao Yu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Web-based decision aids (WDAs) have been shown to have a positive effect when used to improve the quality of decision-making for women facing postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). However, research to determine the effects of WDAs is limited.

Objective:

To compare the impact of WDAs on decisions about PMBR.

Methods:

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched from starting at the time of establishment of the database to May 2023. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was used to assess the risk of bias. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Results:

Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that WDAs used audio and video to present the pros and cons of PMBR versus no PMBR, implants versus flaps, immediate versus delayed PMBR, and the appearance and feel of the PMBR results, and expected recovery time with photographs of actual patients. WDAs may improve in PMBR knowledge, decisional conflict and satisfaction, but have no effect on informed choice, decision regret or anxiety. The overall GRADE quality of the evidence was low.

Conclusions:

The results suggest that the WDAs provide a modern, low-cost, and high dissemination rate effective method to promote improved quality of decision-making in women undergoing PMBR. Clinical Trial: The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO systematic review database (CRD42023450496).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yu L, Gong J, Sun X, Zang M, Liu L, Yu S

Assessing the Content and Effect of Web-Based Decision Aids for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e53872

DOI: 10.2196/53872

PMID: 38801766

PMCID: 11165285

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.