Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 18, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 25, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Completeness of Telehealth Interventions Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials for Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review

Zhu L, Xing Y, Xu W, Jia H, Wang X, Liu S, Ding Y

Completeness of Telehealth Interventions Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials for Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53737

DOI: 10.2196/53737

PMID: 39832360

PMCID: 11791455

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Analysis of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials about telehealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia

  • Ling Zhu; 
  • Yurong Xing; 
  • Wenhui Xu; 
  • Hongfei Jia; 
  • Xiaoxiao Wang; 
  • Shiqing Liu; 
  • Yaping Ding

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

The Template for the Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR)-Telehealth checklist and guide was published in 2022 to guide the reporting of telehealth interventions. However, there is little information regarding the adherence to TIDieR‑Telehealth guidelines in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about care for dementia patients.

Objective:

Objects:To access the quality of reporting of interventions in publications describing RCTs of telehealth in populations with caregivers of people with dementia.

Methods:

Methods:

Relevant RCTs on the telehealth interventions performed by caregivers for dementia patients were extracted from nine databases (Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and VIP Database). The retrieval time was from inception to 26, July, 2023. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool) and analyzed interventions according to the TIDieR-Telehealth checklist.

Results:

Results:

A total of 38 eligible RCTs were included in the final analysis. Only 3 trials all TIDieR items in sufficient detail. The mean number of reported TIDieR items was 6.9 (SD = 1.0) of a possible 12. Most frequently reported were items regarding the brief name of the intervention, the rationale for the intervention, the materials and procedures of intervention. The most frequently missing elements were description of trial location, intervention personalization, intervention modifications and assessment of treatment fidelity.

Conclusions:

Conclusions:

We found that the majority of items remained unreported in the RCTs. Telehealth intervention should adhere to the TIDieR‑Telehealth guidelines more strictly to control the reporting quality.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhu L, Xing Y, Xu W, Jia H, Wang X, Liu S, Ding Y

Completeness of Telehealth Interventions Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials for Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53737

DOI: 10.2196/53737

PMID: 39832360

PMCID: 11791455

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.