Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Serious Games

Date Submitted: Oct 11, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 2, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Impact of Video-Based Error Correction Learning for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: Quasi-Experimental Study

Wang Y, Fu J, Wang S, Wang H, Gao W

Impact of Video-Based Error Correction Learning for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: Quasi-Experimental Study

JMIR Serious Games 2024;12:e53577

DOI: 10.2196/53577

PMID: 39361242

PMCID: 11466053

Impact of video-based error-correction learning for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a quasi-experimental study

  • Yun Wang; 
  • Junzuo Fu; 
  • Shaoping Wang; 
  • Huijuan Wang; 
  • Wei Gao

ABSTRACT

To assess whether the video-based error-correction (VBEC) procedure could improve the training performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among anesthesiology residents. A quasi-experimental study was conducted among anesthesiology residents between December 2022 and April 2023. Eighty anesthesiology residents were divided into a VBEC group (n = 40) and a control group (n = 40). The VBEC group underwent a 15-min VBEC CPR training, whereas the control group underwent a 15-min video-prompting CPR training. Primary outcomes included a post-training knowledge test and practical assessment scores. Secondary outcomes included the number of residents who correctly conducted CPR at each step, the rate of common mistakes during the CPR process, and the self-assessment results. The post-training knowledge test score of the VBEC group was significantly higher than that of the control group (73.0 ± 10.5 vs 65.1 ± 11.4; p < 0.001). The residents in the VBEC group had lower error rates in “failure to anticipate the next move” (7.5% vs 32.5%, p = 0.010) and “failure to debrief or problem solve after the code” (5.0% vs 27.5%; p = 0.013), as well as a higher correct rate of the “secure own safety” step (85.0% vs 45.0%; p < 0.001) than those in the control group. The VBEC group showed significantly higher confidence in CPR than the control group (62.5%vs 35.0%; p = 0.025). VBEC may be a promising strategy compared to the video-prompting procedure in the CPR training of anesthesiology residents.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang Y, Fu J, Wang S, Wang H, Gao W

Impact of Video-Based Error Correction Learning for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: Quasi-Experimental Study

JMIR Serious Games 2024;12:e53577

DOI: 10.2196/53577

PMID: 39361242

PMCID: 11466053

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.