Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 10, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 7, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A New Smartphone-Based Cognitive Screening Battery for Multiple Sclerosis (icognition): Validation Study

Denissen S, Van Laethem D, Baijot J, Costers L, Descamps A, Van Remoortel A, Van Merhaegen-Wieleman A, D’hooghe MB, D'Haeseleer M, Smeets D, Sima DM, Van Schependom J, Nagels G

A New Smartphone-Based Cognitive Screening Battery for Multiple Sclerosis (icognition): Validation Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53503

DOI: 10.2196/53503

PMID: 39832354

PMCID: 11791456

A new smartphone-based cognitive screening battery in multiple sclerosis (icognition): a validation study

  • Stijn Denissen; 
  • Delphine Van Laethem; 
  • Johan Baijot; 
  • Lars Costers; 
  • Annabel Descamps; 
  • Ann Van Remoortel; 
  • Annick Van Merhaegen-Wieleman; 
  • Marie B D’hooghe; 
  • Miguel D'Haeseleer; 
  • Dirk Smeets; 
  • Diana Maria Sima; 
  • Jeroen Van Schependom; 
  • Guy Nagels

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cognitive deterioration is prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and requires regular follow-up, which is time-consuming and costly. Telemedicine could offer a solution, as it is feasible and well-accepted by people with MS. Current smartphone-based applications however focus solely on information processing speed, while memory is also commonly affected.

Objective:

To validate a smartphone-based cognitive screening battery, icognition, to signal deterioration in both memory and information processing speed.

Methods:

icognition consists of three tests (Symbol Test, Dot Test and visual Backwards Digit Span (vBDS)). These tests are based on validated paper-pencil tests: the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), the 10/36 Spatial Recall Test (SPART) and the auditory Backwards Digit Span (aBDS), respectively. To establish the validity of icognition, 101 people with MS and 82 healthy subjects completed all tests. 21 healthy subjects repeated testing 2 to 3 weeks later.

Results:

All tests in icognition correlate well with their paper-pencil equivalent (Symbol Test: r=.67, P<.001; Dot Test: r=.31, P=.002; vBDS: r=.69, P<.001), negatively correlate with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: Symbol Test: rho=-.34, P<.001; Dot Test: rho=-.32, P=.003; vBDS: rho=-.21, P=.04) and show moderate-to-good test-retest reliability (Symbol Test: ICC=.85, r=.85, P<.001; Dot Test: ICC=.73, r=.74, P<.001; vBDS: ICC=.81, r=.83, P<.001). Test performance was comparable between people with MS and healthy subjects for all cognitive tests, both in icognition and the gold standard paper-pencil tests.

Conclusions:

icognition is a valid and reliable tool to remotely screen cognitive performance in persons with MS.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Denissen S, Van Laethem D, Baijot J, Costers L, Descamps A, Van Remoortel A, Van Merhaegen-Wieleman A, D’hooghe MB, D'Haeseleer M, Smeets D, Sima DM, Van Schependom J, Nagels G

A New Smartphone-Based Cognitive Screening Battery for Multiple Sclerosis (icognition): Validation Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53503

DOI: 10.2196/53503

PMID: 39832354

PMCID: 11791456

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.