Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Oct 7, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 17, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Design, Implementation, and Analysis of an Assessment and Accreditation Model to Evaluate a Digital Competence Framework for Health Professionals: Mixed Methods Study

Saigí-Rubió F, Romeu T, Hernández-Encuentra E, Guitert M, Andrés E, Reixach E

Design, Implementation, and Analysis of an Assessment and Accreditation Model to Evaluate a Digital Competence Framework for Health Professionals: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e53462

DOI: 10.2196/53462

PMID: 39418092

PMCID: 11528169

Digital Competence Framework for Health Professionals. Design, Implementation, and Analysis of an Assessment and Accreditation Model

  • Francesc Saigí-Rubió; 
  • Teresa Romeu; 
  • Eulàlia Hernández-Encuentra; 
  • Montse Guitert; 
  • Erik Andrés; 
  • Elisenda Reixach

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although digital health is essential for improving healthcare, its adoption remains slow due to the lack of literacy in this area. It is therefore crucial for health professionals to acquire digital skills and for a digital competence assessment and accreditation model to be implemented in order to make advances in this field.

Objective:

This study has two objectives: (1) to create a specific map of digital competencies for health professionals, and (2) to define and test a digital competence assessment and accreditation model for health professionals.

Methods:

We took an iterative mixed-method approach, which included a review of the gray literature and consultation of local experts. We used the arithmetic mean and standard deviation in descriptive statistics, P-values in hypothesis testing and subgroup comparisons, the greatest lower bound in test diagnosis, and the discrimination index in study instrument analysis.

Results:

The assessment model designed in accordance with the competence content defined in the map of digital competencies and based on scenarios had excellent internal consistency overall (GLB=0.91). Although most study participants reported an intermediate self-perceived digital competence level (90.2%), we found that the vast majority would not attain ACTIC 2 certification (Intermediate Accreditation of Competence in Information and Communication Technologies).

Conclusions:

Knowing the digital competence level of health professionals based on a defined competence framework should enable such professionals to be trained and updated in order to meet real needs in their specific professional contexts and, consequently, to take full advantage of the potential of digital technologies. These results have informed the Health Plan for Catalonia 2021-2025, thus laying the foundations for creating and offering specific training to assess and certify the digital competence of such professionals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Saigí-Rubió F, Romeu T, Hernández-Encuentra E, Guitert M, Andrés E, Reixach E

Design, Implementation, and Analysis of an Assessment and Accreditation Model to Evaluate a Digital Competence Framework for Health Professionals: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e53462

DOI: 10.2196/53462

PMID: 39418092

PMCID: 11528169

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.