Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Oct 9, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 9, 2023 - Oct 24, 2023
Date Accepted: Jan 31, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study

Jensen LWH, Rahbek O, Lauritsen REK, Kold S, Dinesen B

Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e53391

DOI: 10.2196/53391

PMID: 38457798

PMCID: 10960209

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-based Digital Communication Across Settings: A Qualitative Study

  • Lili Worre Høpfner Jensen; 
  • Ole Rahbek; 
  • Rikke Emilie Kildahl Lauritsen; 
  • Søren Kold; 
  • Birthe Dinesen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Orthopedic surgical treatment is a transversal task that requires the active involvement of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals across settings to achieve optimal quality and outcomes. However, after hospital discharge communication between these is challenged and undertaken primarily by phone. New digital communication solutions have the potential to create a space for seamless and patient-centered communication across discipline and sector boundaries. When evaluating new communication solutions, knowledge about healthcare professionals' needs and perspectives of use must be explored, as it is they who are responsible for implementing changes in practice.

Objective:

This study aimed to firstly investigate HCPs’ perceptions of current communication pathways (Phase 1), and secondly to explore their experiences of using a simple messenger-like solution (eDialogue) for team-based digital communication across settings (Phase 2).

Methods:

We employed a triangulation of qualitative data collection techniques, including document analysis, observations, focus group and individual interviews of HCPs before (n=28) and after their use of eDialogue (n=12). Data collection and analysis was inspired by The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to specifically understand facilitators and barriers to implementation as perceived by the healthcare professionals.

Results:

HCPs perceive current communication pathways as insufficient for both patients and themselves. Phone calls are disruptive and there is a lack of direct communication modalities when communication crosses sector boundaries. HCPs experienced the use of eDialogue as a quick and easy way for timely interdisciplinary interaction with patients and other HCPs across settings; however, concerns were raised about resource consumption.

Conclusions:

eDialogue can provide needed support for interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral patient-centered communication. However, future studies of this solution should address effects and the use of resources.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jensen LWH, Rahbek O, Lauritsen REK, Kold S, Dinesen B

Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e53391

DOI: 10.2196/53391

PMID: 38457798

PMCID: 10960209

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.