Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Oct 3, 2023
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing Public Interest in Mammography, Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening, and Computed Tomography Colonography Screening Examinations Using Internet Search Data: Cross-Sectional Study

Zippi ZD, Cortopassi IO, Grage RA, Johnson EM, McCann MR, Mergo PJ, Sonavane SK, Stowell JT, Little BP

Assessing Public Interest in Mammography, Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening, and Computed Tomography Colonography Screening Examinations Using Internet Search Data: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e53328

DOI: 10.2196/53328

PMID: 40068175

PMCID: 11918978

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessing public interest in imaging-based cancer screening examinations using internet search data: comparison of mammography, CT lung cancer screening, and CT colonography

  • Zachary D Zippi; 
  • Isabel O Cortopassi; 
  • Rolf A Grage; 
  • Elizabeth M Johnson; 
  • Matthew R McCann; 
  • Patricia J Mergo; 
  • Sushil K Sonavane; 
  • Justin T Stowell; 
  • Brent P Little

ABSTRACT

Background:

The non-invasive imaging examinations of mammography (MG), low-dose CT for lung cancer screening (LCS) and CT colonography (CTC) play important roles in screening for the most common cancer types. Internet search data can be used to gauge public interest in screening techniques, assess common screening-related questions and concerns, and formulate public awareness strategies.

Objective:

To compare historical Google search volumes for MG, LCS, and CTC and to determine the most common search topics.

Methods:

Google Trends data were used to quantify relative Google search frequencies for these imaging screening modalities over the last two decades. A commercial search engine tracking product (keywordtool.io) was used to assess the content of related Google queries over the year from May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023, and two authors used an iterative process to agree upon a list of thematic categories for these queries. Queries with at least 10 monthly instances were independently assigned to the most appropriate category by the two authors, with disagreements resolved by consensus.

Results:

The mean 20-year relative search volume for MG was approximately 10-fold higher than for LCS and 25-fold higher than for CTC. Search volumes for LCS have trended upward since the publication of the National Lung Screening Trial in 2011. The most common topics of MG-related searches included nearby screening locations (24%) and inquiries about procedural discomfort (11%). Most common LCS-related searches included CT-specific inquiries (48%) or general inquiries (16%), use of AI or deep learning (11%), and eligibility criteria (9%). For CTC, the most common searches were CT-specific inquiries (32%) or for procedural details (25%).

Conclusions:

Over the past two decades, Google search volumes have been significantly higher for MG than for either LCS or CTC, although search volumes for LCS have trended upward since the publication of the National Lung Screening Trial in 2011. Knowledge of public interest and queries related to imaging-based screening techniques may help guide public awareness efforts.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zippi ZD, Cortopassi IO, Grage RA, Johnson EM, McCann MR, Mergo PJ, Sonavane SK, Stowell JT, Little BP

Assessing Public Interest in Mammography, Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening, and Computed Tomography Colonography Screening Examinations Using Internet Search Data: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e53328

DOI: 10.2196/53328

PMID: 40068175

PMCID: 11918978

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.