Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research

Date Submitted: Oct 2, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 2, 2023 - Nov 27, 2023
Date Accepted: Oct 17, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Common Physical Performance Tests for Evaluating Health in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study

Banarjee C, Choudhury R, Park JH, Xie R, Fukuda DH, Stout JR, Thiamwong L

Common Physical Performance Tests for Evaluating Health in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study

Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e53304

DOI: 10.2196/53304

PMID: 39612490

PMCID: 11645506

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Comparing Common Physical Performance Tests for Evaluating Health in Older Adults

  • Chitra Banarjee; 
  • Renoa Choudhury; 
  • Joon-Hyuk Park; 
  • Rui Xie; 
  • David H Fukuda; 
  • Jeffrey R Stout; 
  • Ladda Thiamwong

ABSTRACT

Background:

Interdisciplinary evaluation of older adults’ healthcare is a priority in prevention of chronic health conditions and maintenance of daily functioning. While many studies evaluate different physical performance tests (PPTs) from a retrospective view in predicting mortality or cardiopulmonary health, it remains unclear which of the commonly used PPTs are most effective at evaluating the current health of older adults.

Objective:

This study aims to determine the optimal PPT to evaluate overall physical capacity, performance, and other factors in older adults by comparing three commonly used tests.

Methods:

The present study evaluates 53 older adults using three different PPTs (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT)) and constructs multiple linear regression models with measures of physical activity, static balance, and fear of falling.

Results:

The models reveal that SPPB provides the most comprehensive value as indicated by a greater R2 value, and performance on the SPPB predicts physical activity and fear of falling. ISWT predicted body mass index (BMI) and fear of falling, whereas 6MWT predicted only fear of falling.

Conclusions:

The results indicate the value of a multi-component, comprehensive test such as the SPPB in evaluating the health of the older adult. Additionally, comparison of the two field walking tests (ISWT and 6MWT) further distinguishes ISWT as more predictive of overall health in older adults. In comparing these commonly used PPTs, researchers in the field can determine the most optimal test to evaluate older adults in clinical and research settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Banarjee C, Choudhury R, Park JH, Xie R, Fukuda DH, Stout JR, Thiamwong L

Common Physical Performance Tests for Evaluating Health in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study

Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e53304

DOI: 10.2196/53304

PMID: 39612490

PMCID: 11645506

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.