Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Sep 29, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and the Role of Online Medical Record Use: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study of a National Survey

Ewing A, Marshall D, Tounkara F, Henry A, Abdel-Rasoul M, McElwain S, Clark J, Tarver W, Hefner J, Zaire P, Nolan T, Doubeni C

Examining Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and the Role of Online Medical Record Use: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study of a National Survey

JMIR Cancer 2024;10:e53229

DOI: 10.2196/53229

PMID: 39631060

PMCID: 11634048

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Examining racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening and the role of online medical record use: findings from a national survey

  • Aldenise Ewing; 
  • Daniel Marshall; 
  • Fode Tounkara; 
  • Abhishek Henry; 
  • Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; 
  • Skylar McElwain; 
  • Justice Clark; 
  • Willi Tarver; 
  • Jennifer Hefner; 
  • Portia Zaire; 
  • Timiya Nolan; 
  • Chyke Doubeni

ABSTRACT

Background:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. CRC screening can prevent morbidity and mortality. Existing online medical records (OMR) may be underutilized resources to address healthcare access and communication shortcomings.

Objective:

This study was designed to examine the influence of access to an OMR on CRC screening.

Methods:

In 2023, we conducted a secondary data analysis using a pooled, weighted sample from HINTS 5 Cycles, 2, 3, and 4 (2018-2020). We analyzed the association between sociodemographics, medical conditions, OMR access, and CRC screening via logistic regression.

Results:

The sample included adults aged 45-75 years. Mean age was 59 years (SD: 8) for those who reported CRC screening and 52 years (SD: 6) for those never screened. Nearly 70% of participants reported CRC screening and 52% reported OMR access in the past year. Adjusted odds of CRC screening were higher among non-Hispanic Blacks compared to non-Hispanic Whites (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.22 - 2.53), adults who accessed an OMR (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.45 - 2.46), older individuals (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.21), the insured (OR: 3.69, 95% CI: 2.34 - 5.82), and those with a professional or graduate degree vs those with a high school diploma or less (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.28 - 5.47).

Conclusions:

Promoting access to OMRs— especially among the most disadvantaged Americans—may assist in reaching national screening goals. Future research should center tailored and technologically accessible interventions that educate and expand on OMR access.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ewing A, Marshall D, Tounkara F, Henry A, Abdel-Rasoul M, McElwain S, Clark J, Tarver W, Hefner J, Zaire P, Nolan T, Doubeni C

Examining Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and the Role of Online Medical Record Use: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study of a National Survey

JMIR Cancer 2024;10:e53229

DOI: 10.2196/53229

PMID: 39631060

PMCID: 11634048

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.