Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 10, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Association Between Digital Front Doors and Social Care Use for Community-Dwelling Adults in England: Cross-Sectional Study

Zhang J, Prunty JE, Charles AC, Forder J

Association Between Digital Front Doors and Social Care Use for Community-Dwelling Adults in England: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53205

DOI: 10.2196/53205

PMID: 39746193

PMCID: 11739725

Association between Digital Front Door and Social Care Utilisation for Community-dwelling Adults in England: Cross-sectional Study

  • Jinbao Zhang; 
  • Jonathan E. Prunty; 
  • Alison C. Charles; 
  • Julien Forder

ABSTRACT

Background:

Requests for public social care support can be made through an online portal. These digital ‘front doors’ can help people navigate complex social care systems and access services. These systems can be set up in different ways, but there is little evidence about the impact of alternative arrangements. Digital front-door systems should help people better access services, particularly low-intensity services (high-intensity care is likely to require a full in-person assessment).

Objective:

This study investigates the association between two primary digital front door arrangements—easy read information and self-assessment tools provided on official websites—and the type of social care support that is offered: ongoing low-level support (OLLS), short-term care (STC) and long-term care (LTC).

Methods:

After collecting information on front door arrangements from official websites for 152 English local authorities in 2021, we conducted regression analysis of service use (with data from official Government returns).

Results:

Less than 20% of local authorities provided an integrated digital easy read format as part of their digital front door system with about 25% adopting digital self-assessment within their system. We found that local authorities that offered an integrated digital easy read format showed higher rates of utilising OLLS (Coeff = 0.54, P = .029; but no statistically significant association with LTC and STC). Provision of an online self-assessment system was not associated with service use in the one-year cross-sectional estimate, but when two years of service-use data were analysed, a significant positive association was found on OLLS rates.

Conclusions:

These findings are consistent with our hypothesis that digital systems with built-in easy read and self-assessment may make access to (low-intensity) services easier for people. Adoption of these arrangements could potentially help increase uptake of support amongst those who are eligible, with expected benefits for their care-related well-being.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhang J, Prunty JE, Charles AC, Forder J

Association Between Digital Front Doors and Social Care Use for Community-Dwelling Adults in England: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53205

DOI: 10.2196/53205

PMID: 39746193

PMCID: 11739725

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.