Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Oct 13, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 13, 2023 - Oct 27, 2023
Date Accepted: Mar 12, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study

Doan X, Rossi A, Botes WM, Selzer A

Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e53113

DOI: 10.2196/53113

PMID: 38687983

PMCID: 11094594

Comparing attitudes towards different consent mediums: a qualitative semistructured study

  • Xengie Doan; 
  • Arianna Rossi; 
  • Wilhelmina Maria Botes; 
  • Annika Selzer

ABSTRACT

Background:

As consent for data sharing evolves with the digital age, plain text consent is not the only format in which information can be presented. However, how to design a good consent form is highly challenging. The addition of graphics, video, and other mediums to use can vary widely in effectiveness, and improper use can be detrimental to users.

Objective:

This study explores the expectations and experiences of adults towards consent given in an infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic form in a health data-sharing scenario to better understand the appropriateness of different mediums and identify elements of each medium that most affect engagement with the content.

Methods:

We designed mock consent forms in an infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic version. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults who were interviewed about their expectations for consent then shown each consent medium and asked about 1) engaging elements across mediums and 2) preferences for consent mediums and value of document quality criteria. We transcribed and qualitatively co-coded to identify themes and perform analyses.

Results:

24 users were interviewed, and we identified different thematic archetypes based on participant goals such as Trust Seekers who considered their own understanding and trust in organizations when making decisions. The infographic was ranked first for enhancing understanding, information prioritization, and maintaining the proper audience fit for serious consent in health data sharing scenarios. In addition, specific elements such as structure, step-by-step organization, and readability were preferred engaging elements.

Conclusions:

We identified archetypes to better understand user needs and elements that can be targeted to enhance user engagement with consent forms that can help inform the design of more effective consent for the future. Overall, preferences for mediums are highly contextual and more research should be done.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Doan X, Rossi A, Botes WM, Selzer A

Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e53113

DOI: 10.2196/53113

PMID: 38687983

PMCID: 11094594

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.