Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Sep 22, 2023
Date Accepted: May 18, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Title: Do mobile and electronic health technologies used by people with lung cancer affect physical functioning and wellbeing? A Systematic Literature Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Despite improvements in treatment and early diagnosis people with lung cancer are not living as long as people with other cancers. Therefore, good symptom management and improved quality of life is a priority in this patient group. The more common symptoms of lung cancer; breathlessness, fatigue and depression can be improved by improving patients’ physical functioning. However, current health care services have limited capacity to provide this support. One way to address this issue of health care resources is to empower patients to self-manage their condition using electronic health technologies.
Objective:
The purpose of this review was to locate and assess available research on technologies that support the person with lung cancer to improve or maintain their physical functioning and/or their quality of life.
Methods:
Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, SPORTDiscus and PsychInfo) were searched from January 1990 to April 2023. Studies were suitable for inclusion if; study participants included people with lung cancer over the age of 18, participants were exposed to a physical activity, exercise or a training intervention that was delivered via an electronic or web-based application with or without a comparator. Furthermore, the study must have reported on the impact of the intervention on physical function and/or quality of life. Studies that focused on telemedicine without an online intervention were excluded. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of included papers. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies a narrative synthesis was undertaken.
Results:
This review is reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Seven hundred and ninety-four papers were initially identified through our search; following screening eight papers were confirmed suitable for inclusion in the review. Two papers reported on different stages of the same study therefore only seven studies were included in our analysis. Studies were undertaken between 2010-2018 across multiple countries. Included studies aimed to develop a technology and /or test the technology’s feasibility or acceptance. Seven technologies identified included web-based apps, native apps, or gaming consoles. Studies demonstrated impact on walking distance, muscle strength, balance, symptoms of dyspnoea and cancer related fatigue. Quality of life scores also showed improvement.
Conclusions:
The findings indicate that electronic health apps are generally acceptable to people with lung cancer and can positively impact their physical functioning and wellbeing. However, there are limited studies that demonstrate the impact of these digital interventions over longer periods. None of the studies report on the implementation or adoption of the mobile or electronic health intervention in routine clinical practice highlighting the need for further research in this area. Clinical Trial: Not a trial but has been registered on the PROSPERO data base. Registration number CRD42023414094
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.